We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and conventional reserve-bag oxygen therapy in carbon monoxide intoxication: A pilot study.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019 November 7
BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) creates a positive pressure effect through high-flow rates compared to conventional oxygen therapy. The purpose of this human pilot study is to compare the effects of HFNC and conventional oxygen therapy on the rate of carbon monoxide (CO) clearance from the blood in patients with mild to moderate CO poisoning.
METHODS: CO-poisoned Patients randomly received 100% oxygen from a rebreathing reserve mask (NBO2 , flow of 15 L/min) or HFNC (flow of 60 L/min). The fraction of COHb value (fCOHb) was measured in 30-min intervals until it fell to under 10%. We determined the Half-life time of fCOHb (fCOHb t1/2 ).
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients had fCOHb levels ≥ 10% at the time of ED arrival, with 9 of them having fCOHb level ranging between 25% and 50%. There was no significant difference in the fCOHbt1/2 between the HFNC group and NBO2 group. However, the mean fCOHbt1/2 in the HFNC group (48.5 ± 12.4 min) has a smaller standard deviation than that in the NBO2 group (99.3 ± 93.38 min). There were significant between-group differences in the mean COHbt1/2 among the patients with fCOHb levels less than 25% (HFNC 43.6 ± 10.6 vs. NBO2 134.2 ± 111.3).
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot randomized controlled trial study, HFNC therapy did not reduce fCOHbt1/2 compared to NBO2 therapy but could be beneficial in maintaining a constant fCOHbt1/2 as well as in reducing fCOHbt1/2 in mild CO poisoning patients compared to conventional NBO2 therapy. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to establish HFNC therapy as an alternative therapy for CO poisoning patients.
METHODS: CO-poisoned Patients randomly received 100% oxygen from a rebreathing reserve mask (NBO2 , flow of 15 L/min) or HFNC (flow of 60 L/min). The fraction of COHb value (fCOHb) was measured in 30-min intervals until it fell to under 10%. We determined the Half-life time of fCOHb (fCOHb t1/2 ).
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients had fCOHb levels ≥ 10% at the time of ED arrival, with 9 of them having fCOHb level ranging between 25% and 50%. There was no significant difference in the fCOHbt1/2 between the HFNC group and NBO2 group. However, the mean fCOHbt1/2 in the HFNC group (48.5 ± 12.4 min) has a smaller standard deviation than that in the NBO2 group (99.3 ± 93.38 min). There were significant between-group differences in the mean COHbt1/2 among the patients with fCOHb levels less than 25% (HFNC 43.6 ± 10.6 vs. NBO2 134.2 ± 111.3).
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot randomized controlled trial study, HFNC therapy did not reduce fCOHbt1/2 compared to NBO2 therapy but could be beneficial in maintaining a constant fCOHbt1/2 as well as in reducing fCOHbt1/2 in mild CO poisoning patients compared to conventional NBO2 therapy. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to establish HFNC therapy as an alternative therapy for CO poisoning patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app