We have located links that may give you full text access.
Overgrowth of the Femur After Internal Fixation in Children With Femoral Shaft Fracture-A Multicenter Study.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2020 March
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate overgrowth after internal fixation for pediatric femur fracture and to identify any factors related with overgrowth in terms of fracture type and fixation method.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: Multicenter, children's hospital and general hospital.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-seven children between 4 and 10 years of age were included. Length-stable fracture was noted in 49 children, and length-unstable fracture was found in 38 children.
INTERVENTION: Thirty-six children were treated by minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), and elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation (ESIN) was used in 51 children.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The degree of overgrowth after internal fixation compared to fracture type, fracture site, and surgical method. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors related with overgrowth.
RESULTS: The average overgrowth of the femur was 10.5 ± 7.3 mm. There was no patient who required correction for final leg length discrepancy (>2 cm). There was no significant difference in overgrowth between ESIN (9.9 ± 7.2 mm) and MIPO (11.2 ± 7.6 mm) (P = 0.417). Overgrowth was similar among length-unstable fractures (12.3 ± 7.4 mm) and length-stable fractures (9.2 ± 7.0 mm), although it was statistically greater in length-unstable fractures (P = 0.048). In the MIPO group, length-unstable fractures were associated with an increased log odds of 6.873 for overgrowth of the femur (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: Femur overgrowth after internal fixation seems to not be a clinically significant problem, regardless of whether that be for length-stable or length-unstable fractures and whether they were treated by MIPO or ESIN. Length-unstable fracture may be a risk factor for overgrowth in children. However, the difference is very small, and the postoperative overgrowth would likely not be a significant factor in deciding the surgical plan.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: Multicenter, children's hospital and general hospital.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-seven children between 4 and 10 years of age were included. Length-stable fracture was noted in 49 children, and length-unstable fracture was found in 38 children.
INTERVENTION: Thirty-six children were treated by minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), and elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation (ESIN) was used in 51 children.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The degree of overgrowth after internal fixation compared to fracture type, fracture site, and surgical method. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors related with overgrowth.
RESULTS: The average overgrowth of the femur was 10.5 ± 7.3 mm. There was no patient who required correction for final leg length discrepancy (>2 cm). There was no significant difference in overgrowth between ESIN (9.9 ± 7.2 mm) and MIPO (11.2 ± 7.6 mm) (P = 0.417). Overgrowth was similar among length-unstable fractures (12.3 ± 7.4 mm) and length-stable fractures (9.2 ± 7.0 mm), although it was statistically greater in length-unstable fractures (P = 0.048). In the MIPO group, length-unstable fractures were associated with an increased log odds of 6.873 for overgrowth of the femur (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: Femur overgrowth after internal fixation seems to not be a clinically significant problem, regardless of whether that be for length-stable or length-unstable fractures and whether they were treated by MIPO or ESIN. Length-unstable fracture may be a risk factor for overgrowth in children. However, the difference is very small, and the postoperative overgrowth would likely not be a significant factor in deciding the surgical plan.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app