JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference: Predictor of Septic Patient Prognosis Depending on Central Venous Oxygen Saturation.

Shock 2020 June
This study aimed to assess the viability of using the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (P(v-a)CO2) to predict clinical worsening of septic shock, depending on central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2). The prospective, observational, multicentric study conducted in three intensive care units (ICUs) included all patients with a septic shock episode during the first 6 h, with 122 patients assessed. Clinical worsening was defined as an increase of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores ≥1 (ΔSOFA ≥1) within 2 days. To assess the ability of P(v-a)CO2 to predict clinical worsening, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed according to ΔSOFA. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to confirm model predictions. Associations between P(v-a)CO2 and mortality were explored using correlations. Using multivariate analyses, two independent factors associated with ΔSOFA at least 1 were identified: an averaged 6-h value of lactate concentration (Lac [1-6]) (odds ratios [ORs], 2.43 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.20-4.89]; P = 0.013) and an averaged 6-h value of P(v-a)CO2 (P(v-a)CO2 [1-6]) (OR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.04-2.15]; P = 0.029). ROC analysis confirmed that Lac [1-6] and P(v-a)CO2 [1-6] were significantly associated with ΔSOFA at least 1, whereas ScvO2 [1-6] was not. Finally, ΔSOFA at least 1 was associated with higher 28-day (76% vs. 10%, P = 0.001) and ICU (83% vs. 12%, P = 0.001) mortality rates, which were higher in patients with P(v-a)CO2 [1-6] more than 5.8 mmHg (57% vs. 33%; P = 0.012). In conclusion, P(v-a)CO2 may help predict outcomes for septic shock patients regardless of ScvO2 values.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app