MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search
OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring gender bias in nursing evaluations of emergency medicine residents

Krista Brucker, Nash Whitaker, Zachary S Morgan, Katie Pettit, Erynn Thinnes, Alison M Banta, Megan M Palmer
Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2019 August 1
31373086

OBJECTIVES: Nursing evaluations are an important component of residents' professional development as nurses are present for interactions with patients and non-physician providers. Despite this, there has been few prior studies on the benefits, harms, or effectiveness of using nursing evaluations to help guide emergency medicine residents' development. We hypothesized that gender bias exists in nursing evaluations and that female residents, as compared to their male counterparts, would receive more negative feedback on the perception of their interpersonal communication skills.

METHODS: Data were drawn from nursing evaluations of residents between March 2013 and April 2016. All comments were coded if they contained words falling into four main categories: standout, ability, grindstone, and interpersonal. This methodology and the list of words that guided coding were based on the work of prior scholars. Names and gendered pronouns were obscured and each comment was manually reviewed and coded for valence (positive, neutral, negative) and strength (certain or tentative) by at least two members of the research team. Following the qualitative coding, quantitative analysis was done to test for differences. To evaluate if any measurable differences in ability between male and female residents existed, we compiled and compared ABEM in-training examination scores and relevant milestone evaluations between female and male residents from the same period in which the residents were evaluated by nursing staff.

RESULTS: Of 1,112 nursing evaluations, 30% contained comments. Chi-square tests on the distribution of valence (positive, neutral, or negative) indicated statistically significant differences in ability and grindstone categories based on the gender of the resident. 51% of ability comments about female residents were negative compared to 20% of those about male residents (X2  11.83 p< 0.01). 57% of grindstone comments about female residents were negative as opposed 24% of those about male residents (X2  6.03 p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that, despite the lack of difference in ability or competence as measured by in-service exam scores and milestone evaluations, nurses evaluate female residents lower in their abilities and work ethic as compared to male residents. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
31373086
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"