We have located links that may give you full text access.
Providing health care for patients with childhood cancer and survivors: A survey of pediatric primary care providers.
Cancer 2019 November 2
BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to assess self-reported comfort levels of pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) in providing acute medical care to patients with childhood cancer who currently were receiving therapy (on-therapy patients) and health maintenance care to childhood cancer survivors, independently and in conjunction with pediatric oncologists, along with confidence levels regarding knowledge about immunizations for survivors. All levels were measured using 7-point Likert scales.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, 23-item survey mailed to practicing PCPs affiliated with a tertiary children's hospital was analyzed.
RESULTS: The response rate was 64.4% (259 of 402 eligible PCPs). The mean PCP comfort level was higher when collaborating with a pediatric oncologist to provide acute medical care for on-therapy patients and health maintenance care for childhood cancer survivors (mean ratings of 6.0 ± 1.5 and 6.4 ± 1.3, respectively) compared with independently providing such care (mean ratings of 4.6 ± 1.8 and 5.0 ± 1.7, respectively; P < .0001). Only approximately 30% of PCPs were confident in their knowledge regarding immunizations for survivors. Certain factors were found to be associated with PCP comfort in providing care in conjunction with a pediatric oncologist. For acute care, these factors were rural location compared with urban location (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% CI, 1.9-13.1 [P = .03]) and having cared for ≥6 on-therapy patients within the past year versus none (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.9-7.5 [P = .0001]). For survivor health maintenance care, practice location <50 miles from pediatric oncology specialty care versus ≥50 miles was the only factor found to be associated with PCP comfort (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.1 [P = .009]).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study underscore the need for collaboration between pediatric oncologists and PCPs when caring for children with cancer across the spectrum of care.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, 23-item survey mailed to practicing PCPs affiliated with a tertiary children's hospital was analyzed.
RESULTS: The response rate was 64.4% (259 of 402 eligible PCPs). The mean PCP comfort level was higher when collaborating with a pediatric oncologist to provide acute medical care for on-therapy patients and health maintenance care for childhood cancer survivors (mean ratings of 6.0 ± 1.5 and 6.4 ± 1.3, respectively) compared with independently providing such care (mean ratings of 4.6 ± 1.8 and 5.0 ± 1.7, respectively; P < .0001). Only approximately 30% of PCPs were confident in their knowledge regarding immunizations for survivors. Certain factors were found to be associated with PCP comfort in providing care in conjunction with a pediatric oncologist. For acute care, these factors were rural location compared with urban location (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% CI, 1.9-13.1 [P = .03]) and having cared for ≥6 on-therapy patients within the past year versus none (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.9-7.5 [P = .0001]). For survivor health maintenance care, practice location <50 miles from pediatric oncology specialty care versus ≥50 miles was the only factor found to be associated with PCP comfort (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.1 [P = .009]).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study underscore the need for collaboration between pediatric oncologists and PCPs when caring for children with cancer across the spectrum of care.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app