Outcome comparison of integrated psycho-oncological care versus unstructured care-Results of a non-randomised open-label two-arm trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' experiences with a systematic, integrated psycho-oncological care (IC) model to experiences with "care as usual" (CAU).

METHODS: To improve patients' knowledge about psychosocial support options and to facilitate use, an IC model was developed by psycho-oncologists and a health insurance company and implemented in one German cancer care facility. Using a parallel, non-randomised design, these patients' experiences were compared to CAU patients. In 2015, both patient groups received questionnaires 6-12 months post-inpatient treatment. Main outcomes were awareness, use and opinion of psycho-oncological care (PC) and anxiety level (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)).

RESULTS: 228 patients (IC = 90; CAU = 138) participated (response rate 24%). More IC patients felt adequately informed about PC (63% vs. 46%, ORadj : 2.5 (CI: 1.3-4.8); p = 0.008). More IC patients recalled being offered various support options and had had at least one PC discussion (44% vs. 33%, ORadj of IC patient saying "yes" instead of "No, didn't want to" compared to a CAU patient: 0.4 (CI: 0.2-0.8); p = 0.01). More IC patients rated their care as good/excellent (49% vs. 38%, ORadj : 1.8 (CI: 0.7-4.1; p = 0.2)). Anxiety levels were similar (GAD-7 score>=10: IC 34% vs. CAU 28%; p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION: Structured psycho-oncological care had some positive results on the outcomes, but anxiety levels did not differ.