Interference of hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid, hydroxyphenyllactic acid and tyrosine on routine serum and urine clinical chemistry assays; implications for biochemical monitoring of patients with alkaptonuria treated with nitisinone.
Clinical Biochemistry 2019 June 20
OBJECTIVES: We have assessed the effect of elevated concentrations of hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid (HPPA), hydroxyphenyllactic acid (HPLA) and tyrosine, on a range of chemistry tests in serum and urine to explore the potential for chemical interference on routine laboratory analyses in patients with alkaptonuria (AKU) treated with nitisinone and similarly implications for patients with hypertyrosinemia type1 (HT-1).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPPA, HPLA and tyrosine were added separately to pooled serum from subjects without AKU in a range of assays with Roche Modular chemistries. Effects on urine were assessed by changes in urine strip chemistries after mixing a positive control urine with various amounts of the test compounds and reading on a Siemens urine strip meter.
RESULTS: No significant effect(p > 0.1) was observed up to 225 μmol/L of HPPA and HPLA, and up to 5000 μmol/L tyrosine, on any of the serum-based assays including those with peroxidase-coupled reaction systems of enzymatic creatinine, urate, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride. Both the monohydroxy HPPA, and the dihydroxy homogentisic acid (HGA), at increased urine concentrations typical of nitisinone-treated AKU and non-treated AKU respectively, did however show marked negative interference in strip assays for glucose and leucocytes; i.e. those with peroxide-linked endpoints. The effect of increased HPLA was less marked.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AKU or on nitisinone treatment and HT-1 patients on nitisinone, urine strip chemistry testing should be used sparingly, if at all, to avoid false negative reporting. It is recommended that urine assays should be organised with a suitable specialist laboratory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPPA, HPLA and tyrosine were added separately to pooled serum from subjects without AKU in a range of assays with Roche Modular chemistries. Effects on urine were assessed by changes in urine strip chemistries after mixing a positive control urine with various amounts of the test compounds and reading on a Siemens urine strip meter.
RESULTS: No significant effect(p > 0.1) was observed up to 225 μmol/L of HPPA and HPLA, and up to 5000 μmol/L tyrosine, on any of the serum-based assays including those with peroxidase-coupled reaction systems of enzymatic creatinine, urate, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride. Both the monohydroxy HPPA, and the dihydroxy homogentisic acid (HGA), at increased urine concentrations typical of nitisinone-treated AKU and non-treated AKU respectively, did however show marked negative interference in strip assays for glucose and leucocytes; i.e. those with peroxide-linked endpoints. The effect of increased HPLA was less marked.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AKU or on nitisinone treatment and HT-1 patients on nitisinone, urine strip chemistry testing should be used sparingly, if at all, to avoid false negative reporting. It is recommended that urine assays should be organised with a suitable specialist laboratory.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app