JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Diagnostic accuracy of whole spine magnetic resonance imaging in spinal tuberculosis validated through tissue studies.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis (TB) is based on a combination of clinical features, laboratory tests and imaging studies, since none of these individual diagnostic features are confirmatory. Despite the high sensitivity of MRI findings in evaluating spinal infections, its efficacy in diagnosing spinal TB is less emphasized and remains unvalidated through tissue studies.

METHODOLOGY: We reviewed consecutive patients evaluated for spondylodiscitis with documented clinical findings, MRI spine, and tissue analysis for histopathology, TB culture and genetic TB PCR. MRI features documented include location, contiguous/non-contiguous skip lesions, para/intraosseous abscess, subligamentous spread, vertebral collapse, abscess size/wall, disc involvement, end plate erosion and epidural abscess. Based on the results, patients were divided into two groups-CONFIRMED TB with positive culture/histopathology and NON-TB. The efficacy of MRI findings in accurately diagnosing spinal TB was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Among 150 patients, 79 patients were TB positive, and 71 were TB negative. Three MRI parameters showed significant differences (pā€‰<ā€‰0.001), namely subligamentous spread (67/79, 84.8%), vertebral collapse >ā€‰50% (55/79, 69.6%) and large abscess collection with thin abscess wall (72/79, 91.1%) being strongly predictive of TB. Combination of MRI findings had a higher predictive value. 97.5% of TB positive patients had at least one of these three MRI features, 89.8% patients had any two and 58.2% had all three.

CONCLUSION: Our study validated different MRI findings with tissue studies and showed spinal infections with large abscess with thin wall, subligamentous spread of abscess and vertebral collapse were highly suggestive of spinal tuberculosis. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright Ā© 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app