CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Phases and Phenotypes of Multiple Sclerosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article describes the dynamic evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) through its phases and the impact of this understanding on treatment decisions.

RECENT FINDINGS: MS consists of three phases: (1) the high-risk phase, (2) the relapsing-remitting phase, and (3) the progressive phase. Increasingly, subclinical disease activity is becoming an integral part of our definition of disease course in MS. In many patients, the relapsing-remitting phase starts as subclinical activity, likely long before they present with a clinically isolated syndrome. Differentiating progressive MS subgroups is also becoming less relevant. This is illustrated by comparing progressive MS that evolves from an asymptomatic state in individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome (primary progressive MS) and symptomatic individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (secondary progressive MS). In each case, the background disease activity and pathology can be indistinguishable. These phases evolve on a continuum and largely follow the aging process with little influence by the preceding clinical activity level. Recently, it also became evident that one or a few poorly recovered relapses at the beginning of clinical manifestations of MS predict much earlier progressive MS onset.

SUMMARY: These findings suggest that interventions to prevent progressive MS, when they become available for clinical practice, may need to be considered as early as when the asymptomatic radiologically isolated syndrome is detected. This early treatment approach is being evaluated with ongoing trials with available disease-modifying therapies. In contrast, continuing the use of disease-modifying therapy beyond a certain age may have little benefit. However, being in the progressive phase of MS is not, in itself, an argument against disease-modifying therapy use in active disease in younger patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app