We have located links that may give you full text access.
Investigating the role of psychological flexibility, masculine self-esteem and stoicism as predictors of psychological distress and quality of life in men living with prostate cancer.
European Journal of Cancer Care 2019 May 30
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the predictive power of psychological flexibility, masculine self-esteem and stoicism in influencing psychological distress and quality of life in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. It explores relationships between these theorised predictors and prostate cancer physical symptoms, an established predictor of psychological distress and reduced quality of life.
METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was undertaken with 286 men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer. Correlation, hierarchical multiple regression and conditional process analysis were used to explore relationships between variables.
RESULTS: Psychological flexibility and masculine self-esteem predicted outcomes of distress (β = -0.41, p < 0.001; β = -0.27, p < 0.001, respectively) and quality of life (β = -0.28, p < 0.001; β = -0.28, p < 0.001, respectively), beyond the impact of physical symptoms. Stoicism showed only low correlations with other predictor and outcome variables (r < 0.1). Conditional process analysis showed psychological flexibility moderated the predictive effect of both prostate cancer physical symptoms and masculine self-esteem in predicting distress, but did not moderate these predictors on quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeted at raising psychological flexibility, particularly those that encourage adaptive masculine values, may be effective in reducing psychological distress in prostate cancer patients.
METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was undertaken with 286 men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer. Correlation, hierarchical multiple regression and conditional process analysis were used to explore relationships between variables.
RESULTS: Psychological flexibility and masculine self-esteem predicted outcomes of distress (β = -0.41, p < 0.001; β = -0.27, p < 0.001, respectively) and quality of life (β = -0.28, p < 0.001; β = -0.28, p < 0.001, respectively), beyond the impact of physical symptoms. Stoicism showed only low correlations with other predictor and outcome variables (r < 0.1). Conditional process analysis showed psychological flexibility moderated the predictive effect of both prostate cancer physical symptoms and masculine self-esteem in predicting distress, but did not moderate these predictors on quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeted at raising psychological flexibility, particularly those that encourage adaptive masculine values, may be effective in reducing psychological distress in prostate cancer patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app