We have located links that may give you full text access.
Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Ischemic Heart Disease by PET/MRI: Comparison of Left Ventricular Perfusion, Hibernation, and Scar Burden.
Academic Radiology 2019 April 31
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) is a novel imaging technology that enables a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare simultaneously acquired viability parameters from MRI and PET to determine complementary and redundant information.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) underwent cardiac PET-MR for myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and PET, including a dynamic dual-tracer acquisition of [13 N]ammonia ([13 N]NH3 )/[18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18 F]FDG), were performed simultaneously. Allocation, extent, and transmural degree of left ventricular (LV) scars were measured from LGE. Perfusion, viability, and hibernation were assessed by PET.
RESULTS: A comparison of scar location revealed six more areas of infarction on MR than on PET. Mean LV scarring by CMR was 14% (range, 2% to 42%) and 14% (range, 1% to 46%) by PET (CMR vs. PET: p = 0.9). An intra-individual comparison of scarring showed a good inter-method correlation (r = 0.7), which was also evident in the subgroup with low ejection fraction (EF) (r = 0.6). Hibernation and transmural degree of scars showed a moderate to weak correlation (r = 0.4), which was even worse in the low EF group (r = 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IHD, there was a good correlation between PET and CMR for the LV scar extent using hybrid cardiac PET-MR. The degree of transmural scarring by CMR showed no correlation to PET hibernation. Therefore, cardiac PET-MR might be a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability if used to predict response to cardiac reperfusion strategies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) underwent cardiac PET-MR for myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and PET, including a dynamic dual-tracer acquisition of [13 N]ammonia ([13 N]NH3 )/[18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18 F]FDG), were performed simultaneously. Allocation, extent, and transmural degree of left ventricular (LV) scars were measured from LGE. Perfusion, viability, and hibernation were assessed by PET.
RESULTS: A comparison of scar location revealed six more areas of infarction on MR than on PET. Mean LV scarring by CMR was 14% (range, 2% to 42%) and 14% (range, 1% to 46%) by PET (CMR vs. PET: p = 0.9). An intra-individual comparison of scarring showed a good inter-method correlation (r = 0.7), which was also evident in the subgroup with low ejection fraction (EF) (r = 0.6). Hibernation and transmural degree of scars showed a moderate to weak correlation (r = 0.4), which was even worse in the low EF group (r = 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IHD, there was a good correlation between PET and CMR for the LV scar extent using hybrid cardiac PET-MR. The degree of transmural scarring by CMR showed no correlation to PET hibernation. Therefore, cardiac PET-MR might be a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability if used to predict response to cardiac reperfusion strategies.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app