The diagnostic value of 3D power Doppler ultrasound combined with VOCAL in the vascular distribution of breast masses.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study uses a three-dimensional energy Doppler technique combined with the Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis (VOCAL) method in order to determine the diagnostic threshold of blood flow index in breast tumors to provide a reference for evaluation and treatment options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected 322 solid lesions which had been operated. Each lesion met the definite pathological diagnosis; collected lesions included 262 cases of benign lesions and 60 cases of malignant lesions. All examinations were performed by using GE LOGIQ E9 with VOCAL software. Volume and four distinct vascular indices of gray mean (MG), power mean, ratio (R), and vascular flow index (VFI) were calculated by using the VOCAL software. Sampling and calculation were repeated three times and the mean value was calculated.

RESULTS: The average age and power of the malignant group were greater than those of the benign group, ie p < .01 which had significant differences. The gray mean of the malignant group was lower than that of the benign group, ie p > .05 which had no significant differences between benign and malignant groups. The ratio, vascular flow index and volume had significant differences, i.e. p < .01. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.864, 0.830, 0.800, 0.758, and 0.764 for age, power, ratio, vascular flow index, and volume, respectively. The research indicators were higher than 50% of the curve showing their diagnostic value. The cut-off points of age, power, ratio, vascular flow index, and volume were 37.5, 26.56, 0.031, 0.846, and 1.75, respectively. Their corresponding sensitivity were 93.3%, 75%, 81.7%, 68.3%, 63.3%, and the specificity were 68.7%, 81%, 70.2%, 75.6%, and 81.7%, respectively. Comparison of vascular indices combined with the Breast imaging reporting and data System (BI-RADS) score and simple BI-RADS method, the AUC of power + BI-RADS, ratio + BI-RADS, VFI + BI-RADS, and BI-RADS alone are 0.928, 0.903, 0.895, and 0.796, respectively, which were higher than 50% of the curve. Sensitivity was 81.7%, 80%, 88.3%, 86.7%, and specificity was 88.5%, 85.5%, 77.1%, 69.5%, respectively. The power + BI-RADS method has the highest AUC among these three methods.

CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measurement of blood flow and blood vessel distribution in breast tumors by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound combined with the VOCAL method is more accurate and sensitive than the traditional two-dimensional ultrasound. And this method has potential promising applications in many current active research areas, such as the studies of random distribution of intratumoral blood vessels or the normalization of tumor blood vessels. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound combined with the VOCAL method provides a new approach to achieving accurate judgments and the method evaluates the curative effect in breast cancer patients.