JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Registry-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

JAMA Surgery 2019 July 2
Importance: It is important to develop a surgical technique to reduce dissemination of tumor cells into the blood during surgery.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of different sequences of vessel ligation during surgery on the dissemination of tumor cells and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2016 to March 2018 with patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received thoracoscopic lobectomy in West China Hospital, Daping Hospital, and Sichuan Cancer Hospital. To further compare survival outcomes of the 2 procedures, we reviewed the Western China Lung Cancer database (2005-2017) using the same inclusion criteria.

Interventions: Vein-first procedure vs artery-first procedure.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) after surgery and 5-year overall, disease-free, and lung cancer-specific survival.

Results: A total of 86 individuals were randomized; 22 patients (25.6%) were younger and 64 (74.4%) older than 60 years. Of these, 78 patients were analyzed. After surgery, an incremental change in FR+CTCs was observed in 26 of 40 patients (65.0%) in the artery-first group and 12 of 38 (31.6%) in the vein-first group (P = .003) (median change, 0.73 [interquartile range (IQR), -0.86 to 1.58] FU per 3 mL vs -0.50 [IQR, -2.53 to 0.79] FU per 3 mL; P = .006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the artery-first procedure was a risk factor for FR+CTC increase during surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 4.03 [95% CI, 1.53-10.63]; P = .005). The propensity-matched analysis included 420 patients (210 with vein-first procedures and 210 with artery-first procedures). The vein-first group had significantly better outcomes than the artery-first group for 5-year overall survival (73.6% [95% CI, 64.4%-82.8%] vs 57.6% [95% CI, 48.4%-66.8%]; P = .002), disease-free survival (63.6% [95% CI, 55.4%-73.8%] vs 48.4% [95% CI, 40.0%-56.8%]; P = .001), and lung cancer-specific survival (76.4% [95% CI, 67.6%-85.2%] vs 59.9% [95% CI, 50.5%-69.3%]; P = .002). Multivariate analyses revealed that the artery-first procedure was a prognostic factor of poorer 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.07-2.56]; P = .03), disease-free survival (HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.01-2.04]; P = .05) and lung cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.04-2.61]; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance: Ligating effluent veins first during surgery may reduce tumor cell dissemination and improve survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03436329.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app