Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Regional differences in the prevalence of sensitization to environmental allergens: Analysis on IgE antibody testing conducted at major clinical testing laboratories throughout Japan from 2002 to 2011.

BACKGROUND: Identification of sensitized allergens for patients with respiratory allergy is an important step in disease care and environmental allergen control. The Japanese archipelago belongs to various climate categories due to its length from north to south which transverse the subarctic in the north to the subtropical in the south, suggesting substantial regional differences in dominant environmental allergens. However, few studies have assessed the regional differences in the prevalence of sensitization to environmental allergens.

METHODS: We requested three major clinical testing laboratories to provide us with summarized results of antigen-specific IgE-antibody (Ab) measurements. These measurements were collected for clinical purposes throughout Japan from 2002 through 2011. The prevalence of positivity for IgE-Ab against 19 environmental allergens was calculated for each prefecture in order to evaluate regional differences.

RESULTS: Test data on specific IgE-Ab of 19,969,753 orders were analyzed. The prevalence of positivity for house dust mites was high and the regional difference was low, whereas apparent regional differences were found for pollen, insects, and fungi. The prevalence of positivity for Japanese cedar was low in Hokkaido and Okinawa, while those to alder was highest in Hokkaido. Higher prevalence for insects was observed in southern areas (Okinawa and prefectures in Kyusyu).

CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study clearly demonstrated regional differences in the prevalence of sensitization to environmental allergens in Japan and the study also provides useful information for the clinician when deciding which allergens should preferentially be measured for IgE-Ab after considering regional difference.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app