We have located links that may give you full text access.
Scabies polymerase chain reaction with standardized dry swab sampling: an easy tool for cluster diagnosis of human scabies.
British Journal of Dermatology 2019 April 21
BACKGROUND: Expert visualization of Sarcoptes scabiei remains essential for diagnosing human scabies, but access to said experts can be difficult. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a specific tool for the detection and confirmation of S. scabiei but has poor sensitivity.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PCR as a diagnostic method for scabies using nonexpert-dependent standardized sampling.
METHODS: The dry swab was systematically rubbed across the front of both wrists, the eight interdigital spaces and on any suspected scabies lesions in all patients referred for scabies. A new PCR-based diagnostic test was run on the samples. All patients underwent clinical and dermoscopic examination. Scabies diagnosis was confirmed when dermoscopic examination was positive or the patient had typical clinical signs of scabies.
RESULTS: Of 183 suspected cases of scabies, 164 patients were sampled, 87 had confirmed scabies (dermoscopy positive n = 87, typical clinical signs n = 1) and 77 did not. Of the 87 patients with proved scabies, 33 patients had positive scabies PCR, resulting in a 37·9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28·4-48·4%] sensitivity and a 61·7% (95% CI 52·4-72·7%) negative predictive value. None of the 77 patients ruled out for scabies had a positive PCR result.
CONCLUSIONS: This method is nontraumatic, repeatable and non-expert-dependent. It shows sensitivity similar to previous studies involving expert skin scraping. However, this method facilitates the multiplication of sampling, which increased the sensitivity for cluster scabies diagnosis. This method may be suitable as a first-line diagnosis tool where a large cluster scabies outbreak is suspected.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PCR as a diagnostic method for scabies using nonexpert-dependent standardized sampling.
METHODS: The dry swab was systematically rubbed across the front of both wrists, the eight interdigital spaces and on any suspected scabies lesions in all patients referred for scabies. A new PCR-based diagnostic test was run on the samples. All patients underwent clinical and dermoscopic examination. Scabies diagnosis was confirmed when dermoscopic examination was positive or the patient had typical clinical signs of scabies.
RESULTS: Of 183 suspected cases of scabies, 164 patients were sampled, 87 had confirmed scabies (dermoscopy positive n = 87, typical clinical signs n = 1) and 77 did not. Of the 87 patients with proved scabies, 33 patients had positive scabies PCR, resulting in a 37·9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28·4-48·4%] sensitivity and a 61·7% (95% CI 52·4-72·7%) negative predictive value. None of the 77 patients ruled out for scabies had a positive PCR result.
CONCLUSIONS: This method is nontraumatic, repeatable and non-expert-dependent. It shows sensitivity similar to previous studies involving expert skin scraping. However, this method facilitates the multiplication of sampling, which increased the sensitivity for cluster scabies diagnosis. This method may be suitable as a first-line diagnosis tool where a large cluster scabies outbreak is suspected.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app