MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search
OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Septate uterus by updated ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility, previous miscarriage, and warnings for women and healthcare systems, and associated cost analysis

Artur Ludwin, Inga Ludwin, Marcela A Coelho Neto, Carolina O Nastri, Bala Bhagavath, Steven R Lindheim, Wellington P Martins
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019 April 11
30977223

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the differences in frequency of septate uterus diagnosis and the association with infertility and previous miscarriage using three different criteria.

METHODS: Secondary data-driven analysis of data from prospective study was performed based on data-set of 261 consecutive women of reproductive age from daily clinical practice in private clinic focused on diagnosis and treatment of congenital uterine malformations. Re-analysis of datasets was performed using following definitions of septate uterus: ASRM-2016, ESHRE/ESGE-2016, and CUME-2018 (Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts).

RESULT(S): Although 33% (85/261) of the subjects met one of the three definitions of septate uterus, only 2.6% (7/261) of them fulfilled all three definitions of septate uterus. We observed many more cases of septate uterus using ESHRE/ESGE-2016 than ASRM-2016, (RR=6.7, P<0.01) and CUME-2018 (RR=2.6, P<0.01). We also observed frequent cases that cannot be properly classified by ASRM-2016 (grey zone; 6.5%). There were no significant differences (P = 1.0) in the prevalence of septate uteri in women with and without infertility by ASRM-2016 (5% vs 4%), ESHRE/ESGE-2016 (35% vs 28%), and CUME-2018 (11 vs 12%), respectively. Septate uterus was significantly more frequent in women with previous miscarriage by ASRM-2016 (11% vs 3%; P = 0.04) and CUME-2018 (22 vs 11%; P = 0.04); but there were no significant differences in prevalence of septate uteri by ESHRE/ESGE-2016 in women with and without previous miscarriage (42% vs 28%; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSION(S): The prevalence of septate uterus using ESHRE/ESGE-2016, ASRM-2016 and CUME-2018 criteria are very different. The most important limitation of ASRM classification is the high proportion of unclassifiable cases (grey-zone: neither normal/arcuate nor septate) that should be addressed. The high proportion overdiagnosis of septate uterus by ESHRE/ESGE-2016 may lead to unnecessary surgeries and therefore unnecessary risk to women and impose excessive expenditures on healthcare systems. Efforts for the creation of clinically meaningful, and universally applicable/acceptable criteria should be encouraged. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Trending on Read

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
30977223
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"