Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Surgical treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures by minimally invasive internal fixation facilitated by intra-operative external fixation: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Mid-shaft clavicle fractures are common and may require surgery. The objective of this study in adults with high-risk mid-shaft clavicle fractures was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a minimally invasive surgical technique involving a minimally invasive approach, fracture reduction, temporary intra-operative external fixation, and locking plate internal fixation.

HYPOTHESIS: This minimally invasive surgical technique for mid-shaft clavicle fractures ensures satisfactory radiographic fracture healing and medium-term functional outcomes, with a short immobilisation, rapid return to sports, and low complication rate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of patients managed using our minimally invasive surgical technique between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. The primary outcome measure was the 3-month radiographic healing rate. The secondary outcome measures were duration of post-operative immobilisation, 3- and 6-month QuickDASH scores, and post-operative complications.

RESULT: A total of 19 patients were included, 18 males and 1 female with a mean age of 37 years. Radiographic healing was consistently achieved within 3 months. Immobilisation duration was 3 weeks. The mean QuickDASH score was 23.75 after 3 months and 7.5 after 6 months. Return to sports occurred after 3 months. The only complication was transient paraesthesia in the distribution of the C8 nerve root in 1 patient.

DISCUSSION: The management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. The high complication rates associated with conventional surgical techniques make treatment decisions difficult. A surgical technique characterised by temporary intra-operative external fixation to facilitate minimally invasive internal fixation may have a lower complication rate and shorter immobilisation requirements compared to conventional surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective observational study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app