Your institution is subscribed to Read Institutional Edition. Log in or Sign Up to read full text articles.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Concurrent Ipsilateral Tibial Shaft and Distal Tibial Fractures in Pediatric Patients: Risk Factors, Frequency, and Risk of Missed Diagnosis

Benjamin W Sheffer, Eric D Villarreal, Mims G Ochsner, Jeffrey R Sawyer, David D Spence, Derek M Kelly
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2019 April 8
30969196

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of concurrent ipsilateral distal tibial fractures with tibial shaft fractures in the pediatric population; to identify patient and fracture characteristics that increase the likelihood of a concurrent fracture; and determine if any of these concurrent distal tibial fractures were missed on initial radiographic examination.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review was done to identify patients 5 to 17 years old who were treated for a tibial shaft fracture at a large, Level 1 free-standing children's hospital and an outpatient orthopaedic practice between 2008 and 2016. Patient and fracture characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS: Of 517 fractures (515 patients), 22 (4.3%) had concurrent ipsilateral distal tibial fractures: 11 triplane, 5 medial malleolar, 3 bimalleolar, and 2 Tillaux (Salter-Harris III) ankle fractures, and 1 Salter-Harris II distal tibial fracture. Age was the only patient characteristic significantly associated with a second, more distal fracture: patients with both fractures were older (12.7 y) than those with an isolated tibial shaft fracture (11 y). There was no difference in the rate of distal tibial fractures between high-energy and low-energy mechanisms of injury and no differences in the rate of open injuries or the presence of a fibular fracture. Patients with a tibial shaft fracture at the junction of the middle and distal thirds were significantly more likely to have a concurrent distal tibial fracture; oblique and spiral fracture patterns were more frequent in the group with concurrent distal tibial fractures than in the isolated tibial shaft fracture group.

CONCLUSIONS: In our series, 36% of the concurrent distal tibial fractures were not diagnosed until chart review for this study, which suggests the need for ankle-specific imaging in certain patients. We recommend ankle-specific imaging when an oblique or spiral tibial shaft fracture is located at the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the tibia or in patients in whom a distal tibial fracture is suspected because of pain, swelling, or bruising.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
30969196
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.