We have located links that may give you full text access.
The effect of two types of maximal voluntary contraction and two electrode positions in field recordings of forearm extensor muscle activity during hotel room cleaning.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of using hand grip or resisted wrist extension as reference contraction, and two electrode positions, on field recordings of forearm extensor muscle activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The right forearm extensor muscle activity was recorded using two pairs of electrodes (over the most prominent part; position 2 and proximal to that; position 1) during one working day in 13 female hotel housekeepers. Each subject performed the two maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs), and the electrical activity obtained during these (the maximal voluntary electrical activity; MVE) was used for normalisation. Each set of recordings was analysed twice, once using hand grip as MVC and once using resisted wrist extension.
RESULTS: Resisted wrist extension showed higher group mean MVE than hand grip. Position 2 had higher correlation between MVE and force during the MVCs. The workload during cleaning was lower when using resisted wrist extension as the reference than when using hand grip (24%MVE versus 46%MVE; p = 0.002 at position 2) for the 90th percentile. The workload (99th percentile) was overestimated in two subjects when using hand grip as reference.
CONCLUSIONS: Problems associated with poorly activated forearm extensors can be overcome by using resisted wrist extension as reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The right forearm extensor muscle activity was recorded using two pairs of electrodes (over the most prominent part; position 2 and proximal to that; position 1) during one working day in 13 female hotel housekeepers. Each subject performed the two maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs), and the electrical activity obtained during these (the maximal voluntary electrical activity; MVE) was used for normalisation. Each set of recordings was analysed twice, once using hand grip as MVC and once using resisted wrist extension.
RESULTS: Resisted wrist extension showed higher group mean MVE than hand grip. Position 2 had higher correlation between MVE and force during the MVCs. The workload during cleaning was lower when using resisted wrist extension as the reference than when using hand grip (24%MVE versus 46%MVE; p = 0.002 at position 2) for the 90th percentile. The workload (99th percentile) was overestimated in two subjects when using hand grip as reference.
CONCLUSIONS: Problems associated with poorly activated forearm extensors can be overcome by using resisted wrist extension as reference.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app