Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Re-biopsy and liquid biopsy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure.

Thoracic Cancer 2019 April
BACKGROUND: Re-biopsy is important for exploring resistance mechanisms, especially for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who develop resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA has come into use for this purpose. This retrospective study investigated the status of re-biopsy and liquid biopsy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and evaluated their effect on clinical strategies and prognosis.

METHODS: Five hundred fifty-five NSCLC patients with resistance to EGFR-TKIs were included and divided into three groups: re-biopsy, liquid biopsy, and no re-biopsy. Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR or super ARMS PCR was used to detect EGFR mutations.

RESULTS: Three hundred eight (55.5%) patients underwent re-biopsy; 45.5% (140/308) were positive for T790M. The most common re-biopsy procedure was computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (60.1%), followed by effusion drainage (29.5%) and superficial lymph node biopsy (6.5%). One hundred eighteen (21.3%) patients underwent liquid biopsy; the T790M detection rate was 41.5% (49/118.) Of the 308 patients who underwent re-biopsy, 69 were examined for EGFR mutations with plasma. The concordance rate of T790M detection between tissue and plasma was 66.7%. A statistical difference in further treatment after EGFR-TKI failure was observed among all groups (P = 0.014). Patients in the biopsy groups were more likely to receive third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Multivariate analysis showed that re-biopsy had a significant impact on overall survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Re-biopsy plays a pivotal role in the management of patients with NSCLC and resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Liquid biopsy may be an alternative if difficulties performing re-biopsy exist.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app