Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pathologic nodal clearance and complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer: Predictors and long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE: From prospective studies, pathologic nodal clearance (PNC, ypN0) and pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0N0) correlate with overall survival (OS) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for cN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Contemporary cooperative group trials attempt to increase radiation doses to achieve nodal clearance and/or pCR. However, long-term comparative outcomes of dose-escalated neoadjuvant chemoradiation are lacking. The goal of this study was to evaluate rates of PNC and pCR in a large population of cN2 NSCLC, predictors thereof, and long-term outcomes thereafter.

METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for histologically-confirmed cT1-4N2M0 NSCLC undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by lobectomy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier OS analysis before and following propensity matching, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and sensitivity analysis when varying neoadjuvant radiation dose.

RESULTS: Of 1750 patients, the pCR and PNC rates were 17% and 37%, respectively. Radiation dose >54 Gy independently predicted for pCR. Patients achieving pCR experienced significantly higher OS than non-pCR cases (p < 0.001) and ypT + ypN0 cases (p < 0.001). In the subset of non-PNC patients, there was a trend towards higher OS in patients in whom ypT0 was achieved (p = 0.059). On sensitivity analysis, when separating the cohort into doses of 45.0-50.4 Gy, 50.5-54.0 Gy, 54.1-59.4 Gy, and >59.4 Gy, 30-day mortality rates in the respective groups were 2.9%, 1.8%, 1.2%, and 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS: Although neoadjuvant dose-escalation increases pCR rates, there is no OS benefit with dose-escalation, and high dose-escalation (i.e., >59.4 Gy) was associated with numerically higher mortality rates, indicating the importance of careful multidisciplinary discussion.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app