We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of autoantibodies against the M2-muscarinic receptor with long-term outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy patients: A 5-year prospective study.
Journal of Cardiology 2019 March 14
BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is characterized by heart failure. Our previous study found that autoantibodies against the M2-muscarinic receptor (anti-M2-R) are increased in PPCM patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of anti-M2-R on prognosis of PPCM patients with standard treatment.
METHODS: Synthetic peptides corresponding to the M2 receptor served as the target antigens in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiment. They were used to screen the sera of 80 PPCM patients, who were separated into anti-M2-R-negative and positive groups according to their anti-M2-R reactivity. Clinical assessment and echocardiography examination were performed at baseline and after 5 years with a standard treatment regimen. The endpoint events were compared after 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: There were 76 PPCM patients who completed the final data analysis, including 36 in the anti-M2-R (+) group and 40 in the anti-M2-R (-) group. Both groups showed improvement in the left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and the ejection fraction with standard treatment regimens for 5 years (all p<0.001). Patients in the anti-M2-R (-) group had greater tolerance and were more rapidly titrated to metoprolol, and they had better improvement in cardiac function than patients in the anti-M2-R (+) group (p<0.05). Patients in the anti-M2-R (-) group had a marked decrease in re-hospitalization (p<0.05), but not in all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. Being positive for anti-M2-R increased the risk of PPCM (OR=4.7, 95% CI 1.8-12.2, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: PPCM patients, especially anti-M2-R (-) patients, have a relatively better prognosis than other patients. We posit that the presence of anti-M2-R may be involved in the pathogenesis of PPCM.
METHODS: Synthetic peptides corresponding to the M2 receptor served as the target antigens in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiment. They were used to screen the sera of 80 PPCM patients, who were separated into anti-M2-R-negative and positive groups according to their anti-M2-R reactivity. Clinical assessment and echocardiography examination were performed at baseline and after 5 years with a standard treatment regimen. The endpoint events were compared after 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: There were 76 PPCM patients who completed the final data analysis, including 36 in the anti-M2-R (+) group and 40 in the anti-M2-R (-) group. Both groups showed improvement in the left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and the ejection fraction with standard treatment regimens for 5 years (all p<0.001). Patients in the anti-M2-R (-) group had greater tolerance and were more rapidly titrated to metoprolol, and they had better improvement in cardiac function than patients in the anti-M2-R (+) group (p<0.05). Patients in the anti-M2-R (-) group had a marked decrease in re-hospitalization (p<0.05), but not in all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. Being positive for anti-M2-R increased the risk of PPCM (OR=4.7, 95% CI 1.8-12.2, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: PPCM patients, especially anti-M2-R (-) patients, have a relatively better prognosis than other patients. We posit that the presence of anti-M2-R may be involved in the pathogenesis of PPCM.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app