Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical outcomes in HIV+/HCV+ coinfected kidney transplant recipients in the pre- and post-direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy eras: 10-year single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated inferior patient and graft survival following kidney transplant (KT) in HIV+/HCV+ coinfected patients compared to HIV+/HCV- recipients. However, these studies were conducted prior to the availability of direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents and data in the modern era is lacking.

METHODS: Single center retrospective study of HIV+/HCV+ coinfected KT recipients (2007-2017). Outcomes were assessed for the pre-DAA and post-DAA (i.e., after December 2013) eras including 1-year patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection; and serious infections (defined as infections requiring admission to the intensive care unit during initial transplant hospitalization or re-admission to the hospital after discharge) within the first six months post-transplant.

RESULTS: A total of 13 consecutive HIV+/HCV+ recipients were identified. Median time of posttransplant follow up was 722 days. Seven patients were transplanted in the DAA era; 5 of them had anti-HCV Ab+ donors, with 2 donors being HCV NAT positive; all received DAA therapy, 6 of them post-transplant (median time from KT to DAA: 83 days; IQR, 54 - 300). All the patients in the pre-DAA era were on a protease inhibitor-containing ART regimen. 1-year patient and death-censored graft survival were 83% and 67%, respectively, for the patients transplanted in the pre-DAA era, and 100% for both outcomes in the subgroup of patients transplanted in the post-DAA era (p>0.05). Compared to patients in the post-DAA era, those in the pre-DAA era had higher incidence of serious infections (0 vs. 67%; p=0.02). Acute rejection exclusively occurred in the pre-DAA group (n=1; 17%).

CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of HIV+/HCV+ KT recipients, including HIV-/HCV+ to HIV+/HCV+ transplants, in the DAA era were excellent in this small cohort. Larger studies are needed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app