Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Autologous Conditioned Plasma for tendon healing following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Prospective comparative assessment with magnetic resonance arthrography at 6 months' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in technique and materials for rotator cuff repair, mean re-tear rates remain close to 30%. The aim of the present study was to assess injection of Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP™, Arthrex) for tendon healing after arthroscopic repair. The study hypothesis was that ACP™ improves the tendon-healing rate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A non-randomized comparative prospective study included all patients aged over 18 years operated on in 2010 for arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear with≤2 fatty degeneration on the Goutallier classification, whatever the severity of retraction, on virgin non-osteoarthritic shoulder without contraindications for magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The surgical protocol was standardized. The first half of the patient sample received end-of-procedure ACP™ injection to the repaired tendon, tuberosity freshening surface and subacromial space, and the second (control) half received no supplementary treatment. The main endpoint was tendon healing on MR arthrography at 6 months according to Sugaya. Secondary endpoints comprised shoulder pain at rest on a numerical scale (0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain) and Constant functional score.

RESULTS: Two of the 58 patients refused MR arthrography and 7 were lost to follow-up. Forty-nine patients (26 ACP™, 23 controls) were analyzed: 20 male, 29 female; mean age, 61±7.3 years. There were no significant intergroup differences in healing rate at 6 months (ACP™ 73.1% vs. 78.3% controls; p=0.75), shoulder pain (2±1.8 vs. 2.6±1.7, respectively; p=0.24), or Constant score (77±13.5/100 vs. 72.4±12.3, respectively; p=0.18).

CONCLUSION: Associating ACP™ did not improve healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Sample size, however, had been calculated for a large expected difference, leading to lack of power.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app