Assessing bioavailability of ruminally protected methionine and lysine prototypes.

Met and Lys are essential AA that can limit lactational performance in dairy cattle fed protein-sufficient diets. Thus, there is industry demand for ruminally protected (RP) sources of Met and Lys. One method of providing ruminal protection for Met and Lys is lipid encapsulation. The objective of this work was to assess 3 lipid-encapsulated Met prototypes (P1, P2, and P3) and 1 Lys prototype (P4) to determine ruminal protection, small intestine absorption (experiment 1), and animal production responses (experiment 2). Ruminal protection was estimated from 8-h in situ retention during ruminal incubation and intestinal absorption from plasma appearance after an abomasal bolus of the in situ retentate. Blood samples were collected over time to determine plasma Met and Lys concentration responses compared with unprotected Lys and Met infused abomasally. The prototypes were not exposed to the total diet or subjected to typical feed handling methods before evaluation. The bioavailability of P1, P2, and P3 Met prototypes was found to be 14, 21, and 18% of the initial AA material, respectively. The RP-Lys prototype had a bioavailability of 45%. To evaluate production responses, 20 Holstein cows were randomly assigned to 2 trials (n = 10 each) in a replicated Latin square design with 14-d periods. The base diet was predicted to be deficient in metabolizable Met (-14.8 g/d) and Lys (-16.1 g/d) per the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (version 6.55). In the Met trial, the base diet was supplemented with RP-Lys to meet Lys requirements, and treatments were as follows: no added RP-Met (NCM), NCM plus Smartamine M (SM; Adisseo, Alpharetta, GA), and NCM plus P1, P2, or P3 at 148% of the Met content of SM. In the Lys trial, the base diet was supplemented with RP-Met to meet the Met requirement, and treatments were as follows: no added Lys (NCL), NCL plus AjiProL (AL; Ajinomoto Heartland Inc., Chicago, IL), and NCL plus P4 at 55, 78, or 102% of the reported absorbed Lys in AL. All products were top dressed on the diet without prior mixing or extended exposure to the rest of the diet. Milk protein concentration significantly increased when diets were supplemented with P2, P3, or SM (3.12, 3.12, and 3.11%, respectively) compared with NCM (3.02%). Only P1 (3.04%) was significantly lower than SM. Prototype P2 had the greatest numerical milk protein output response among the 3 RP-Met prototypes, suggesting that it may have had the greatest efficacy when supplemented into these rations. There was a numerical milk protein concentration response to AL and a linear increase in milk protein concentration for P4. The P4 and AL treatments resulted in comparable milk protein production regardless of P4 dose.