We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pipeline Embolization Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Pseudoaneurysms.
World Neurosurgery 2019 March 6
BACKGROUND: Intracranial pseudoaneurysms (PSA) are associated with high rupture and mortality rates and have traditionally been treated by parent vessel sacrifice. There has been recent interest in utilizing flow-diverting devices for treatment of these complex lesions while preserving flow through the parent artery.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the safety and efficacy of these devices in the treatment of intracranial PSA.
METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of intracranial PSA treated with the Pipeline Embolization device (PED, Medtronic) between 2014 and 2017 at 7 institutions. Complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients underwent PED placement for intracranial PSA. Iatrogenic injury and trauma comprised the majority of etiologies in our series. The mean pseudoaneurysm diameter 8.8 mm and 18/19 (95%) PSA involved the internal carotid artery (ICA). Multiple PED were deployed in a telescoping fashion in 7 patients (37%). Of the 18 patients with follow up imaging, 14 (78%) achieved complete pseudoaneurysm obliteration and two achieved near complete obliteration (11%). Two (11%) patients were found to have significant pseudoaneurysm progression on short-term follow-up and required ICA sacrifice. No patients experienced new neurologic deficits or deterioration secondary to PED placement. No patients experienced bleeding or rebleeding from PSA.
CONCLUSION: In well-selected patients, the use of flow-diverting stents may be a feasible alternative to parent vessel sacrifice. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with PSA, we recommend short and long-term radiographic follow up for patients treated with flow-diverting stents.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the safety and efficacy of these devices in the treatment of intracranial PSA.
METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of intracranial PSA treated with the Pipeline Embolization device (PED, Medtronic) between 2014 and 2017 at 7 institutions. Complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients underwent PED placement for intracranial PSA. Iatrogenic injury and trauma comprised the majority of etiologies in our series. The mean pseudoaneurysm diameter 8.8 mm and 18/19 (95%) PSA involved the internal carotid artery (ICA). Multiple PED were deployed in a telescoping fashion in 7 patients (37%). Of the 18 patients with follow up imaging, 14 (78%) achieved complete pseudoaneurysm obliteration and two achieved near complete obliteration (11%). Two (11%) patients were found to have significant pseudoaneurysm progression on short-term follow-up and required ICA sacrifice. No patients experienced new neurologic deficits or deterioration secondary to PED placement. No patients experienced bleeding or rebleeding from PSA.
CONCLUSION: In well-selected patients, the use of flow-diverting stents may be a feasible alternative to parent vessel sacrifice. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with PSA, we recommend short and long-term radiographic follow up for patients treated with flow-diverting stents.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app