We have located links that may give you full text access.
The factors that lead to a delay between general practitioner referral of symptomatic patients and specialist diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an audit in the Bay of Plenty District Health Board.
New Zealand Medical Journal 2019 March 9
AIM: To determine factors leading to delay between referral by the GP of symptomatic patients and subsequent specialist diagnosis of colon or rectum cancer (CRC).
METHOD: A retrospective audit of patients with new CRC referred by their GP over a 30-month period to the specialist services. Analysis of referral letters, specialist grading and subsequent results of investigations. We focused on the High Index of Suspicion (HIS) criteria for suspected CRC.
RESULTS: Only 65 out of 181 patients fulfilled the HIS criteria and of these only half were correctly identified in the referral letter. Only 48 who fulfilled HIS criteria were graded as urgent by the specialist and had their fast-track diagnostic test within a median of 21 days (5-114). The remaining 133 waited a median of 67 days (10-387) (p<0.001). The diagnosis was reached faster if the patient went straight to colonoscopy rather than initial outpatient assessment: median 32 versus 81 days (p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: The HIS Urgent pathway only identified a third of patients and so the criteria should be reviewed. GPs frequently failed to recognise and refer those who met the criteria. A standardised referral form prompting the inclusion of all required information would improve this.
METHOD: A retrospective audit of patients with new CRC referred by their GP over a 30-month period to the specialist services. Analysis of referral letters, specialist grading and subsequent results of investigations. We focused on the High Index of Suspicion (HIS) criteria for suspected CRC.
RESULTS: Only 65 out of 181 patients fulfilled the HIS criteria and of these only half were correctly identified in the referral letter. Only 48 who fulfilled HIS criteria were graded as urgent by the specialist and had their fast-track diagnostic test within a median of 21 days (5-114). The remaining 133 waited a median of 67 days (10-387) (p<0.001). The diagnosis was reached faster if the patient went straight to colonoscopy rather than initial outpatient assessment: median 32 versus 81 days (p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: The HIS Urgent pathway only identified a third of patients and so the criteria should be reviewed. GPs frequently failed to recognise and refer those who met the criteria. A standardised referral form prompting the inclusion of all required information would improve this.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app