We have located links that may give you full text access.
Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress Score Is a Useful Prognostic Indicator for Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Digestive Surgery 2019 March 8
BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among the elderly has been increasing. Therefore, determining postoperative prognosis factors in elderly CRC patients has clinical importance. This study retrospectively investigated the prognostic significance of the estimation of physiological ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) in elderly CRC patients.
METHODS: This study enrolled 166 elderly patients aged 75 or more with a histopathological diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery.
RESULTS: According to the results of receiver operating characteristic analysis, the patients were divided into the following 2 groups based on the comprehensive risk score (CRS): CRS of ≥0.05 (CRSHigh) and CRS of < 0.05 (CRSLow). The 5-year overall survival rates of CRSHigh group and CRSLow group were 51.1 and 89.6%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 5-year disease-specific survival rates of CRSHigh group and CRSLow group were 81.4 and 96.3%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.017). Also, multivariate analysis indicated that CRS was an independent prognostic indicator in elderly CRC patients. With regard to the cause of death, both recurrence and cancer-unrelated deaths were observed significantly more in the CRSHigh group than in the CRSLow group.
CONCLUSIONS: E-PASS was a useful prognostic indicator in elderly CRC patients.
METHODS: This study enrolled 166 elderly patients aged 75 or more with a histopathological diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery.
RESULTS: According to the results of receiver operating characteristic analysis, the patients were divided into the following 2 groups based on the comprehensive risk score (CRS): CRS of ≥0.05 (CRSHigh) and CRS of < 0.05 (CRSLow). The 5-year overall survival rates of CRSHigh group and CRSLow group were 51.1 and 89.6%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 5-year disease-specific survival rates of CRSHigh group and CRSLow group were 81.4 and 96.3%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.017). Also, multivariate analysis indicated that CRS was an independent prognostic indicator in elderly CRC patients. With regard to the cause of death, both recurrence and cancer-unrelated deaths were observed significantly more in the CRSHigh group than in the CRSLow group.
CONCLUSIONS: E-PASS was a useful prognostic indicator in elderly CRC patients.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app