We have located links that may give you full text access.
Differences of articular and extra-articular involvement in polymyalgia rheumatica: A comparison by whole-body FDG-PET/CT.
Modern Rheumatology 2019 March 8
OBJECTIVES: To clarify differences in incidences of articular and extra-articular involvement in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) using FDG-PET/CT.
METHODS: Twenty PMR patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. We compared frequency, degree, and patterns (diffuse or non-diffuse) of abnormal FDG accumulation in the proximal and distal articular structures (PAS, DAS), and extra-articular synovial structures (ESS). Regional analyses were performed for the large joints (shoulder, hip, and knee).
RESULTS: The incidences of positive FDG accumulation were significantly higher in the PAS (96.7%) and ESS (91.4%) than in the DAS (31.8%, p < .0001), although, the incidence in the knees (96.2%) was exceptionally high. PAS (2.79 ± 0.61) and ESS (2.52 ± 0.85) had significantly higher visual scores than DAS (0.89 ± 1.33, p < .0001). Shoulder, hip, and knee joints each had a different accumulation pattern. Strong FDG accumulation was frequently observed in the medial-to-subscapular part of the shoulder joints, the lateral part of the hip joints, and the medial part of the knee joints.
CONCLUSION: ESS were found to be the main affected areas in PMR patients as well as PAS. DAS involvement occurred with low frequency except in the knee joints. Each large joint showed a different accumulation pattern and its own characteristically strongly affected areas.
METHODS: Twenty PMR patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. We compared frequency, degree, and patterns (diffuse or non-diffuse) of abnormal FDG accumulation in the proximal and distal articular structures (PAS, DAS), and extra-articular synovial structures (ESS). Regional analyses were performed for the large joints (shoulder, hip, and knee).
RESULTS: The incidences of positive FDG accumulation were significantly higher in the PAS (96.7%) and ESS (91.4%) than in the DAS (31.8%, p < .0001), although, the incidence in the knees (96.2%) was exceptionally high. PAS (2.79 ± 0.61) and ESS (2.52 ± 0.85) had significantly higher visual scores than DAS (0.89 ± 1.33, p < .0001). Shoulder, hip, and knee joints each had a different accumulation pattern. Strong FDG accumulation was frequently observed in the medial-to-subscapular part of the shoulder joints, the lateral part of the hip joints, and the medial part of the knee joints.
CONCLUSION: ESS were found to be the main affected areas in PMR patients as well as PAS. DAS involvement occurred with low frequency except in the knee joints. Each large joint showed a different accumulation pattern and its own characteristically strongly affected areas.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app