Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Impact of Cycling Cadence on Respiratory and Hemodynamic Responses to Exercise.

PURPOSE: The physiological consequences of freely chosen cadence (FCC) during cycling remains poorly understood. We sought to determine the effect of cadence on the respiratory and hemodynamic response to cycling exercise.

METHODS: Eleven cyclists (10M:1F; age=27±6yr; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max=60.8±3.7ml·kg·min) completed four, 6-min constant-load cycling trials at 10% below their previously determined gas exchange threshold (i.e., 63±5% peak power) while pedaling at 60, 90, and 120rpm, and a FCC (94.3±6.9rpm), in randomized order. Standard cardiorespiratory parameters were measured and an esophageal electrode balloon catheter was used to assess electromyography of the diaphragm (EMGdi) and the work of breathing (Wb). Leg blood flow index (BFI) was determined on four muscles using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with indocyanine green dye injections.

RESULTS: Oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) increased as a function of increasing cadence (all pairwise comparisons, p<0.05). EMGdi and Wb were significantly greater at 120rpm compared to all other conditions (all p<0.01). Vastus medialis and semitendinosus BFI were significantly greater at 120rpm compared to 60 rpm and 90 rpm (all p<0.05). Gastrocnemius BFI was higher at 120 rpm compared to all other cadences (all p<0.01). No difference in BFI was found in the vastus lateralis (p=0.06). BFI was significantly correlated with the increase in V[Combining Dot Above]O2 with increasing cadence in the medial gastrocnemius (p<0.001) and approached significance in the vastus lateralis (p=0.09), vastus medialis (p=0.06), and semitendinosus (p=0.09). There was no effect of cadence on Borg 0-10 breathing or leg discomfort ratings (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: High cadence cycling at submaximal exercise intensities is metabolically inefficient and increases EMGdi, Wb, and leg muscle blood flow relative to slower cadences.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app