I recently cared for a patient, Ms. Clark, admitted with a cardiac complication of a primary pancreatobiliary process. The details of her pathology, however, are less relevant than the attitudes of her clinicians: we were caught in an endless loop of passing the buck. We on the primary cardiology..

The Not-My-Problem Problem.

New England Journal of Medicine

Cardiogenic shock is a complex syndrome defined by systemic hypoperfusion and inadequate cardiac output arising from a wide array of underlying causes. Although the understanding of cardiogenic shock epidemiology, specific subphenotypes, haemodynamics, and cardiogenic shock severity staging has evolved, few therapeutic interventions have shown survival benefit. Results from seminal randomised controlled trials support early revascularisation of the culprit vessel in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and provide evidence of improved survival with the use of temporary circulatory support in selected patients. However, numerous questions remain unanswered, including optimal pharmacotherapy regimens, the role of mechanical circulatory support devices, management of secondary organ dysfunction, and best supportive care. This Review summarises current definitions, pathophysiological principles, and management approaches in cardiogenic shock, and highlights key knowledge gaps to advance individualised shock therapy and the evidence-based ethical use of modern technology and resources in cardiogenic shock.

Cardiogenic shock.

Lancet

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that, although exceedingly rare, carries a significant burden for the affected patient population. The complex and ambiguous pathophysiology of this condition further complicates clinical management and therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, being a diagnosis of exclusion requires a diligent workup to ensure an accurate diagnosis and subsequent targeted management. The development of the Budapest diagnostic criteria helped to consolidate existing definitions of CRPS but extensive work remains in identifying the underlying pathways. Currently, two distinct types are identified by the presence (CRPS type 1) or absence (CRPS type 2) of neuronal injury. Current management directed at this disease is broad and growing, ranging from non-invasive modalities such as physical and psychological therapy to more invasive techniques such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation and potentially amputation. Ideal therapeutic interventions are multimodal in nature to address the likely multifactorial pathological development of CRPS. Regardless, a significant need remains for continued studies to elucidate the pathways involved in developing CRPS as well as more robust clinical trials for various treatment modalities.

A brief review of complex regional pain syndrome and current management.

Annals of Medicine

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with high mortality rates. Although the goal was to achieve a missed diagnosis rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math> 1%, the actual data showed a rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math> 2%. Chest pain diagnosis has remained unchanged over the years and is based on medical interviews and electrocardiograms (ECG), with biomarkers playing complementary roles. We aimed to summarize the key points of medical interviews, ECG clinics, use of biomarkers, and clinical scores, identify problems, and provide directions for future research. Medical interviews should focus on the character and location of chest pain (is it accompanied by radiating pain?) and the duration, induction, and ameliorating factors. An ECG should be recorded within 10 minutes of the presentation. The serial performance of an ECG is recommended for emergency department (ED) evaluation of suspected ACS. Characteristic ECG traces, such as Wellens syndrome and De Winter T-waves, should be understood. Therefore, troponin levels in all patients with suspected ischemic heart disease should be examined using a highly sensitive assay system. Depending on the ED facility, the patient should be risk stratified by serial measurements of cardiac troponin levels (re-testing at one hour would be preferred) to determine the appropriate time to perform an invasive strategy for a definitive diagnosis. The diagnostics should be based on Bayes' theorem; however, care should be taken to avoid the influence of heuristic bias.

How to Approach Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Kawasaki disease (KD), an acute self-limited febrile illness that primarily affects children &lt;5 years old, is the leading cause of acquired heart disease in developed countries, with the potential of leading to coronary artery dilation and coronary artery aneurysms in 25% of untreated patients. This update summarizes relevant clinical data published since the 2017 American Heart Association scientific statement on KD related to diagnosis, cardiac imaging in acute KD treatment, and long-term management. Criteria defining North American patients at high risk for developing coronary artery aneurysms who may benefit from more intensive initial treatment have been published. Advances in cardiovascular imaging have improved the ability to identify coronary artery stenosis in patients with KD, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding optimal frequency of serial imaging and the best imaging modality to identify those at risk for inducible myocardial ischemia. Recent data have advanced the understanding of safety and dosing for several anti-inflammatory therapies in KD. New anticoagulation medication, myocardial infarction management, transition of health care for patients with KD, and future directions in research are discussed.

Update on Diagnosis and Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation

Immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with cancer, represent a momentous and increasing portion of the population, especially as cancer incidence rises with population growth and aging. These patients are at a heightened risk of developing severe infections, including sepsis and septic shock, due to multiple immunologic defects such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and T and B-cell impairment. The diverse and complex nature of these immunologic profiles, compounded by the concomitant use of immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, and immunotherapy), superimposed by the breakage of natural protective barriers (e.g., mucosal damage, chronic indwelling catheters, and alterations of anatomical structures), increases the risk of various infections. These and other conditions that mimic sepsis pose substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Factors that elevate the risk of progression to septic shock in these patients include advanced age, pre-existing comorbidities, frailty, type of cancer, the severity of immunosuppression, hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and type and timing of responses to initial treatment. The management of vulnerable cancer patients with sepsis or septic shock varies due to biased clinical practices that may result in delayed access to intensive care and worse outcomes. While septic shock is typically associated with poor outcomes in patients with malignancies, survival has significantly improved over time. Therefore, understanding and addressing the unique needs of cancer patients through a new paradigm, which includes the integration of innovative technologies into our healthcare system (e.g., wireless technologies, medical informatics, precision medicine), targeted management strategies, and robust clinical practices, including early identification and diagnosis, coupled with prompt admission to high-level care facilities that promote a multidisciplinary approach, is crucial for improving their prognosis and overall survival rates.

Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.

Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF) represents a frequent form of PH related to left ventricular dysfunction. The pathophysiology of PH-HFpEF is intricate, and varied and includes vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary factors that contribute synergistically to developing this clinical syndrome. Improved knowledge of the pathophysiology of PH-HFpEF has paved the way for the use of new drugs such as angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), non-steroidal mineral corticoid receptor antagonist (nsMRA), sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2is), levosimendan, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists. ARNIs are a widely used drug for the treatment of PH associated with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. They have also recently been used in PH-HFpEF patients with hemodynamic benefits that need to be confirmed in future research. Finerenone is an innovative non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that exhibits notable cardioprotective and renoprotective properties in individuals suffering from chronic diabetic kidney disease. It also enhances outcomes for patients with heart failure, whether they have mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Moreover, in experimental studies, finerenone has been found to lower pulmonary artery pressure, reduce muscularization, and decrease the wall thickness of pulmonary arteries. SGLT2i have revolutionized the treatment of patients with heart failure irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, and their treatment is also associated with an improvement in the hemodynamics profile in patients with PH-HFpEF. Levosimendan is a widely used inodilator in the treatment of acute and advanced heart failure. In addition, its use in patients with PH-HFpEF (supported by the positive effects on pulmonary hemodynamics that levosimendan exerts) has recently demonstrated hemodynamic benefit in a small phase 2 study that paved the way for phase 3 studies and the creation of an oral formulation of levosimendan. Finally, GLP1 agonists are a class of drugs that, in preliminary evidence, have shown a positive effect on cardiac hemodynamics, mainly by facilitating left ventricular unloading. These effects, along with the reduction in insulin resistance and weight loss, likely lead to beneficial outcomes for PH-HFpEF patients, especially those with obesity as a comorbidity.

The Not-My-Problem Problem.

Full text links

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

The Not-My-Problem Problem.

Full text links

Related Resources

Trending Papers

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app