We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Evaluation frameworks in health services: an integrative review of use, attributes and elements.
Journal of Clinical Nursing 2019 Februrary 28
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim was to synthesise the evidence on the use of evaluation frameworks by nurses and midwives in research designed to improve healthcare services and practice. A secondary aim was to identify the attributes and elements of evaluation frameworks.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation is an integral component of any initiative to improve outcomes or change clinical practice. Yet often an evaluation may not yield the information required to sustain or integrate an initiative into practice. Evaluation frameworks can support effective evaluations, but there is a lack of consensus regarding elements and attributes of frameworks that support use.
METHODS: We undertook an integrative review to synthesise the use of evaluation frameworks in practice guided by the Preferred reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis flow diagram and checklist 2009 (supplementary file 4). The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087033). A broad range of electronic databases were systematically searched using key words.
FINDINGS: Twenty-five papers were included from a diverse range of clinical areas and across high, middle and low income nations. Twenty of the research projects had used nine existing frameworks and five had developed an evaluation specific to an initiative. Frameworks supported the processes of evaluation and made them more meaningful by: simplifying a complex process (providing structure and guidance for the evaluation processes); identifying and including stakeholders; explaining reasons for outcomes; generating transferable lessons; and identifying the mechanisms driving or inhibiting change.
CONCLUSION: Nurses and midwives reported that frameworks were useful in undertaking evaluations. Each framework had positive attributes and missing or confusing elements. When undertaking an evaluation, it is pertinent to review the elements and attributes of a framework to ensure it includes evaluation measures that are relevant to specific projects.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses are actively involved in evaluation of clinical practice. This review identifies important elements to consider when choosing a framework for evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation is an integral component of any initiative to improve outcomes or change clinical practice. Yet often an evaluation may not yield the information required to sustain or integrate an initiative into practice. Evaluation frameworks can support effective evaluations, but there is a lack of consensus regarding elements and attributes of frameworks that support use.
METHODS: We undertook an integrative review to synthesise the use of evaluation frameworks in practice guided by the Preferred reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis flow diagram and checklist 2009 (supplementary file 4). The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087033). A broad range of electronic databases were systematically searched using key words.
FINDINGS: Twenty-five papers were included from a diverse range of clinical areas and across high, middle and low income nations. Twenty of the research projects had used nine existing frameworks and five had developed an evaluation specific to an initiative. Frameworks supported the processes of evaluation and made them more meaningful by: simplifying a complex process (providing structure and guidance for the evaluation processes); identifying and including stakeholders; explaining reasons for outcomes; generating transferable lessons; and identifying the mechanisms driving or inhibiting change.
CONCLUSION: Nurses and midwives reported that frameworks were useful in undertaking evaluations. Each framework had positive attributes and missing or confusing elements. When undertaking an evaluation, it is pertinent to review the elements and attributes of a framework to ensure it includes evaluation measures that are relevant to specific projects.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses are actively involved in evaluation of clinical practice. This review identifies important elements to consider when choosing a framework for evaluation.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app