We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Heparin-Binding Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker of Sepsis and Disease Severity at the Emergency Department.
Shock 2019 December
OBJECTIVE: Rapid and early detection of patients at risk to develop sepsis remains demanding. Heparin-binding protein (HBP) has previously demonstrated good prognostic properties in detecting organ dysfunction among patients with suspected infections. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma levels of HBP as a prognostic biomarker for infection-induced organ dysfunction among patients seeking medical attention at the emergency department.
DESIGN: Prospective, international multicenter, convenience sample study.
SETTING: Four general emergency departments at academic centers in Sweden, Switzerland, and Canada.
PATIENTS: All emergency encounters among adults where one of the following criteria were fulfilled: respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute; heart rate >120 beats per minute; altered mental status; systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg; oxygen saturation <90% without oxygen; oxygen saturation <93% with oxygen; reported oxygen saturation <90%.
INTERVENTION: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 524 emergency department patients were prospectively enrolled, of these 236 (45%) were eventually adjudicated to have a noninfectious disease. Three hundred forty-seven patients (66%) had or developed organ dysfunction within 72 h, 54 patients (10%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 23 patients (4%) died within 72 h. For the primary outcome, detection of infected-related organ dysfunction within 72 h, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for HBP was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78) among all patients and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or no infection. Against the secondary outcome, infection leading to admittance to the ICU, death or a persistent high SOFA-score due to an infection (SOFA-score ≥5 at 12-24 h) HBP had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) among all patients and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or noninfection.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at the emergency department, HBP demonstrated good prognostic and discriminatory properties in detecting the most severely ill patients with infection.
DESIGN: Prospective, international multicenter, convenience sample study.
SETTING: Four general emergency departments at academic centers in Sweden, Switzerland, and Canada.
PATIENTS: All emergency encounters among adults where one of the following criteria were fulfilled: respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute; heart rate >120 beats per minute; altered mental status; systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg; oxygen saturation <90% without oxygen; oxygen saturation <93% with oxygen; reported oxygen saturation <90%.
INTERVENTION: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 524 emergency department patients were prospectively enrolled, of these 236 (45%) were eventually adjudicated to have a noninfectious disease. Three hundred forty-seven patients (66%) had or developed organ dysfunction within 72 h, 54 patients (10%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 23 patients (4%) died within 72 h. For the primary outcome, detection of infected-related organ dysfunction within 72 h, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for HBP was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78) among all patients and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or no infection. Against the secondary outcome, infection leading to admittance to the ICU, death or a persistent high SOFA-score due to an infection (SOFA-score ≥5 at 12-24 h) HBP had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) among all patients and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or noninfection.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at the emergency department, HBP demonstrated good prognostic and discriminatory properties in detecting the most severely ill patients with infection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app