We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of Superior and Inferior Division Occlusions Treated with Endovascular Thrombectomy.
Clinical Neuroradiology 2019 Februrary 21
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several studies have shown that thrombectomy is safe and effective in occlusions of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery. This retrospective study compared superior and inferior division occlusions regarding radiological and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2017, patients treated with thrombectomy due to occlusion of the superior or inferior division were selected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcome and compare superior and inferior division occlusions.
RESULTS: A total of 140 patients with superior (n = 87) and inferior (n = 53) division occlusion were included. Of patients with inferior division occlusion 66.0% achieved good outcome compared to 48.3% in patients with superior division occlusion (P = 0.041). Time from groin puncture to reperfusion, recanalization success, complication rate, hemorrhage rate and follow-up infarct size were similar in both groups. Independent predictors of good outcome were baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (odds ratio, OR 1.74, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.21-2.58, P = 0.004), time from groin puncture to reperfusion (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.0, P = 0.019) and Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score 2b-3 (OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.31-18.74, P = 0.024). Superior division occlusion was an independent predictor of poor outcome (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.05-5.80, P = 0.042). Dominance of the occluded vessel and side of occlusion were not predictive.
CONCLUSION: Patients with superior division occlusion appear to have a lower chance of achieving good outcome despite similar recanalization rates and complication rates compared to inferior division occlusions.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2017, patients treated with thrombectomy due to occlusion of the superior or inferior division were selected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcome and compare superior and inferior division occlusions.
RESULTS: A total of 140 patients with superior (n = 87) and inferior (n = 53) division occlusion were included. Of patients with inferior division occlusion 66.0% achieved good outcome compared to 48.3% in patients with superior division occlusion (P = 0.041). Time from groin puncture to reperfusion, recanalization success, complication rate, hemorrhage rate and follow-up infarct size were similar in both groups. Independent predictors of good outcome were baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (odds ratio, OR 1.74, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.21-2.58, P = 0.004), time from groin puncture to reperfusion (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.0, P = 0.019) and Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score 2b-3 (OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.31-18.74, P = 0.024). Superior division occlusion was an independent predictor of poor outcome (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.05-5.80, P = 0.042). Dominance of the occluded vessel and side of occlusion were not predictive.
CONCLUSION: Patients with superior division occlusion appear to have a lower chance of achieving good outcome despite similar recanalization rates and complication rates compared to inferior division occlusions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app