We have located links that may give you full text access.
HISTORICAL ARTICLE
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Perforations and bleeding in a population-based cohort of all registered colonoscopies in Sweden from 2001 to 2013.
United European Gastroenterology Journal 2019 Februrary
Background: The rates of perforation and bleeding are important quality measures of colonoscopy performance.
Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the frequency of colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation in Swedish counties and to relate these findings to patient characteristics.
Method: Data on 593,308 colonoscopies performed on adults from 2001 to 2013 were retrieved from Swedish inpatient and outpatient registers. Covariates were assessed in a multivariate Poisson regression model. The correlation between perforation and bleeding was calculated with Pearson's bivariate correlation formula.
Results: The relative frequency of bleeding and perforation vary across counties (bleeding: 0.02%-0.27%; perforation: 0.02%-0.27%). There were significant positive correlations between the relative frequency of bleeding and perforation at the county level, both including ( r = 0.792, p < 0.001) and excluding polypectomies r = 0.814 ( p < 0.001). The relative risks of these conditions in the counties ranged from 0.12, p < 0.001, to 1.53, p = 0.05 (bleeding) and from 0.17, p = 0.002, to 2.42, p < 0.001 (perforation).
Conclusions: There are substantial differences in colonoscopy performance in Sweden. These differences do not seem to be explained by patient characteristics.
Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the frequency of colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation in Swedish counties and to relate these findings to patient characteristics.
Method: Data on 593,308 colonoscopies performed on adults from 2001 to 2013 were retrieved from Swedish inpatient and outpatient registers. Covariates were assessed in a multivariate Poisson regression model. The correlation between perforation and bleeding was calculated with Pearson's bivariate correlation formula.
Results: The relative frequency of bleeding and perforation vary across counties (bleeding: 0.02%-0.27%; perforation: 0.02%-0.27%). There were significant positive correlations between the relative frequency of bleeding and perforation at the county level, both including ( r = 0.792, p < 0.001) and excluding polypectomies r = 0.814 ( p < 0.001). The relative risks of these conditions in the counties ranged from 0.12, p < 0.001, to 1.53, p = 0.05 (bleeding) and from 0.17, p = 0.002, to 2.42, p < 0.001 (perforation).
Conclusions: There are substantial differences in colonoscopy performance in Sweden. These differences do not seem to be explained by patient characteristics.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app