We have located links that may give you full text access.
Living-Donor Kidney Transplant With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies.
Experimental and Clinical Transplantation 2019 January
OBJECTIVES: We investigated outcomes in living-donor kidney transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (detected with flow cytometry and specified with the LABScreen single antigen test) under desensitization pretransplant and immunosuppression posttransplant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 15 recipients included, 8 had ABO-incompatible kidney transplant. Six patients had sensitization caused by pregnancy, 8 by blood transfusion, 5 by previous transplants, and 1 by unknown cause. Desensitization was initiated using calcineurin inhibitors, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil 30 days pretransplant, with rituximab administered 1 and 10 days pretransplant. Patients underwent plasmapheresis 1, 3, and 5 days pretransplant. Antithymocyte globulin was admi nistered for 5 days posttransplant as induction therapy. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, all recipients underwent protocol renal allograft biopsies, with donor-specific antibodies simultaneously measured with the single antigen test.
RESULTS: T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative in all 15 recipients, but T-cell and B-cell flow cytometry was positive in 8 and 14 recipients, respectively. Anti-HLA class I antibodies became negative, except in 1 recipient 3 months posttransplant. Class II antibodies remained positive in 8 recipients 3 months posttransplant. No clinical or subclinical T-cell-mediated rejection occurred, but 1 recipient experienced clinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, 8 and 5 recipients had subclinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. Cytomegalovirus test showed positivity in 14 recipients, but none developed cytomegalovirus disease. BK viremia was detected in 2 recipients, with 1 developing BK virus nephropathy, which was reversed by reducing immunosuppression.
CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies showed good outcomes in terms of desensitization and immunosuppression. However, most anti-HLA class II donor-specific antibodies remained, and microvascular inflammation score could indicate long-term risk of renal allograft dysfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 15 recipients included, 8 had ABO-incompatible kidney transplant. Six patients had sensitization caused by pregnancy, 8 by blood transfusion, 5 by previous transplants, and 1 by unknown cause. Desensitization was initiated using calcineurin inhibitors, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil 30 days pretransplant, with rituximab administered 1 and 10 days pretransplant. Patients underwent plasmapheresis 1, 3, and 5 days pretransplant. Antithymocyte globulin was admi nistered for 5 days posttransplant as induction therapy. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, all recipients underwent protocol renal allograft biopsies, with donor-specific antibodies simultaneously measured with the single antigen test.
RESULTS: T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative in all 15 recipients, but T-cell and B-cell flow cytometry was positive in 8 and 14 recipients, respectively. Anti-HLA class I antibodies became negative, except in 1 recipient 3 months posttransplant. Class II antibodies remained positive in 8 recipients 3 months posttransplant. No clinical or subclinical T-cell-mediated rejection occurred, but 1 recipient experienced clinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, 8 and 5 recipients had subclinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. Cytomegalovirus test showed positivity in 14 recipients, but none developed cytomegalovirus disease. BK viremia was detected in 2 recipients, with 1 developing BK virus nephropathy, which was reversed by reducing immunosuppression.
CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies showed good outcomes in terms of desensitization and immunosuppression. However, most anti-HLA class II donor-specific antibodies remained, and microvascular inflammation score could indicate long-term risk of renal allograft dysfunction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app