We have located links that may give you full text access.
Widening Time Disparities between Two Paradigms: Tama-REgistry of Acute Endovascular Thrombectomy.
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases : the Official Journal of National Stroke Association 2019 Februrary 14
BACKGROUND: The Tama-REgistry of Acute endovascular Thrombectomy (TREAT) is a multicenter registry of endovascular thrombectomy in the Tama area of Tokyo. The objective of this study was to confirm the real-world status of 2 paradigms of transportation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from TREAT. Patients were divided into 2 groups and 2 periods: directly admitted to an endovascular thrombectomy-capable center (ECC; group D)/secondary transfer from a non-ECC (group S), and the first period/the second period. Transfer distance, workflow metrics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 326 patients, including 264 in group D and 62 in group S, were analyzed. The median distance from the onset-to-ECC was 3.62 km for group D and 7.87 km for group S (P < .001). The median onset-to-needle (OTN) time was longer for group S (168 minutes) than group D (138 minutes; P = .006). The median onset-to-reperfusion (OTR) time was significantly shorter for group D (247 minutes) than for group S (304 minutes; P = .029). With respect to the 2 periods, there was no significant difference in onset-to-puncture time between the 2 groups in the first period (207 minutes versus 243.5 minutes, respectively, P = .50), while there was one in the second period (164 minutes versus 246.5 minutes, respectively, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: This region-wide registry study showed longer OTN and OTR times, with no improvement of the time course over time in patients transported via non-ECCs. These results should be used to create a regional medical policy for the management of acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from TREAT. Patients were divided into 2 groups and 2 periods: directly admitted to an endovascular thrombectomy-capable center (ECC; group D)/secondary transfer from a non-ECC (group S), and the first period/the second period. Transfer distance, workflow metrics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 326 patients, including 264 in group D and 62 in group S, were analyzed. The median distance from the onset-to-ECC was 3.62 km for group D and 7.87 km for group S (P < .001). The median onset-to-needle (OTN) time was longer for group S (168 minutes) than group D (138 minutes; P = .006). The median onset-to-reperfusion (OTR) time was significantly shorter for group D (247 minutes) than for group S (304 minutes; P = .029). With respect to the 2 periods, there was no significant difference in onset-to-puncture time between the 2 groups in the first period (207 minutes versus 243.5 minutes, respectively, P = .50), while there was one in the second period (164 minutes versus 246.5 minutes, respectively, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: This region-wide registry study showed longer OTN and OTR times, with no improvement of the time course over time in patients transported via non-ECCs. These results should be used to create a regional medical policy for the management of acute ischemic stroke.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app