Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Contemporary trends of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder and associated cancer specific mortality and complications: comparison between octogenarian versus younger patients.

Cancer Epidemiology 2019 Februrary 14
BACKGROUND: We analysed contemporary pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) trend during radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB), as well as PLND association with cancer specific mortality (CSM) and complications after stratification according to octogenarian vs. younger age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within the SEER and NIS databases, respectively 10,427 (T2 and T3 stages) and 19,203 (all T-stages) RC patients (2004-2015) for UCUB were identified. Univariable and multivariable analyses focused on PLND rates, CSM after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment, complication rates, length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charge (THC).

RESULTS: Within the SEER database, RC and PLND was performed in 9,406 patients (87.4%), 981 (10.4%) octogenarians and 8,227 younger patients (at, respectively, 83 and 89% PLND). PLND rates increased over time in both patients groups (p < 0.05). PLND was independently associated with lower CSM in both age groups (octogenarians: hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, p < 0.001; younger patients: HR 0.56, p < 0.001). Within the NIS database, PLND was marginally higher associated with overall complications in octogenarians than in younger patients (odd ratio [OR]: 1.32 vs. 1.23, both p < 0.001), with longer LOS (OR: 1.20 vs. 1.08, both p < 0.001), higher THC (relative increase: 6933 vs. 4484, both p < 0.001), but not with higher in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: PLND is associated with lower CSM, but its rate lags in octogenarian vs. younger patients. In both age groups, PLND leads to marginally higher complications, longer LOS and higher THC, but not to higher in-hospital mortality.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app