We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of early patency rate and long-term outcomes of various techniques for reconstruction of segmental arteries during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2019 Februrary 13
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyse the early patency rate and long-term outcomes of reattached segmental intercostal arteries using graft interposition, single-cuff anastomosis or island reconstruction.
METHODS: We selected 172 consecutive patients who underwent open surgery for the thoracoabdominal aorta with reattachment of segmental arteries between October 1999 and March 2018. The early patency of segmental arteries was analysed using enhanced computed tomography. Segmental arteries were reconstructed using graft interposition (n = 111), single-cuff anastomosis (n = 38) or island reconstruction (n = 23).
RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 6.4%. Twenty patients developed spinal cord ischaemic injury (permanent, n = 12 or transient, n = 8). Spinal cord injury was found in 16, 3 and 1 patients in the graft interposition, single-cuff anastomosis and island reconstruction groups, respectively. Overall, 475 segmental arteries were reattached (mean number per patient 2.8 ± 1.3). The overall early patency rate was 63.4%. The patency rates in island reconstruction (91.2%) and single-cuff anastomosis (77.1%) were significantly better than that in graft interposition (54.0%; P < 0.01). However, 6 patients with island reconstruction of segmental arteries had an aneurysm formation at the intercostal artery reconstruction site, of whom 4 patients underwent reoperation during follow-up. None of the patients with graft interposition or single-cuff reattachment had a patch aneurysm in segmental arteries.
CONCLUSIONS: Island reconstruction and single-cuff anastomosis might offer better patency rates and prevent spinal cord ischaemic injury than graft interposition. Because some patients with island reconstruction required reoperation for patch aneurysms in segmental arteries, single-cuff anastomosis is preferable in terms of early- and long-term outcomes.
METHODS: We selected 172 consecutive patients who underwent open surgery for the thoracoabdominal aorta with reattachment of segmental arteries between October 1999 and March 2018. The early patency of segmental arteries was analysed using enhanced computed tomography. Segmental arteries were reconstructed using graft interposition (n = 111), single-cuff anastomosis (n = 38) or island reconstruction (n = 23).
RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 6.4%. Twenty patients developed spinal cord ischaemic injury (permanent, n = 12 or transient, n = 8). Spinal cord injury was found in 16, 3 and 1 patients in the graft interposition, single-cuff anastomosis and island reconstruction groups, respectively. Overall, 475 segmental arteries were reattached (mean number per patient 2.8 ± 1.3). The overall early patency rate was 63.4%. The patency rates in island reconstruction (91.2%) and single-cuff anastomosis (77.1%) were significantly better than that in graft interposition (54.0%; P < 0.01). However, 6 patients with island reconstruction of segmental arteries had an aneurysm formation at the intercostal artery reconstruction site, of whom 4 patients underwent reoperation during follow-up. None of the patients with graft interposition or single-cuff reattachment had a patch aneurysm in segmental arteries.
CONCLUSIONS: Island reconstruction and single-cuff anastomosis might offer better patency rates and prevent spinal cord ischaemic injury than graft interposition. Because some patients with island reconstruction required reoperation for patch aneurysms in segmental arteries, single-cuff anastomosis is preferable in terms of early- and long-term outcomes.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app