We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effects of two frequencies of vibration on the maxillary canine distalization rate and RANKL and OPG secretion: a randomized controlled trial.
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 2019 Februrary 14
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of 30 and 60 Hz vibratory stimulus on canine distalization and RANKL and OPG secretion.
SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty patients requiring canine distalization at the Orthodontic Clinic, X X X University.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 30 Hz vibration (n=20), 60 Hz vibration (n=20), or the control group (n=20). Modified electric toothbrushes were used to apply vibration to the randomly selected canine for 20 min/day by the investigator combined with 60 cN continuous distalization force from day 1 to day 7. RANKL and OPG were analysed before (T1) and 24 h (T2), 48 h (T3) and 7 days (T4) after initiation of distalization. From day 8, vibratory devices were used by the subjects at home. Rate of canine distalization (T1 to three months after initiation [T5]) was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for multiple comparisons (significance level, 0.05).
RESULTS: Canine distalization rate was not different between groups (median; 0.82, 0.87, and 0.83 mm/month for 30 Hz, 60 Hz, and control group, respectively; P>0.05). No within- or between-group differences in RANKL and OPG were observed (P>0.05), except RANKL on the compression side of the control group was significantly higher at T2, T3 and T4 than T1 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: In the clinic, 30 and 60 Hz vibratory stimulus have no additive effect on rate of canine distalization rate, RANKL and OPG secretion or RANKL/OPG ratio. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty patients requiring canine distalization at the Orthodontic Clinic, X X X University.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 30 Hz vibration (n=20), 60 Hz vibration (n=20), or the control group (n=20). Modified electric toothbrushes were used to apply vibration to the randomly selected canine for 20 min/day by the investigator combined with 60 cN continuous distalization force from day 1 to day 7. RANKL and OPG were analysed before (T1) and 24 h (T2), 48 h (T3) and 7 days (T4) after initiation of distalization. From day 8, vibratory devices were used by the subjects at home. Rate of canine distalization (T1 to three months after initiation [T5]) was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for multiple comparisons (significance level, 0.05).
RESULTS: Canine distalization rate was not different between groups (median; 0.82, 0.87, and 0.83 mm/month for 30 Hz, 60 Hz, and control group, respectively; P>0.05). No within- or between-group differences in RANKL and OPG were observed (P>0.05), except RANKL on the compression side of the control group was significantly higher at T2, T3 and T4 than T1 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: In the clinic, 30 and 60 Hz vibratory stimulus have no additive effect on rate of canine distalization rate, RANKL and OPG secretion or RANKL/OPG ratio. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app