We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of measurements of anti-PLA2R antibodies in Japanese patients with membranous nephropathy using in-house and commercial ELISA.
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 2019 Februrary 14
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of antibodies against M-type anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) was reported to be ~ 70-80% in early studies on idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) cohorts from Western countries, China, and Korea, and ~ 50% in recent studies on two Japanese iMN cohorts.
METHODS: We developed an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-PLA2R antibodies, and examined sera from 217 patients with iMN, 22 patients with secondary MN (sMN), and 50 healthy individuals. All patients and healthy individuals were Japanese. The relationships between levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies and clinical parameters were analyzed. Serum samples were also tested using a standardized commercial ELISA (Euroimmun, Germany).
RESULTS: In our ELISA, OD values greater than the mean + 3 standard deviation of healthy subjects were considered to be positive for anti-PLA2R antibodies. Of the patients with iMN, 33.6% (73/217) were positive, but all sMN patients were negative. Our ELISA and the Euroimmun ELISA had a high concordance (93.5%). The proportion of patients with nephrotic syndrome was significantly higher in anti-PLA2R antibody-positive patients than in antibody-negative patients (65.8 vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001). Levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies were significantly correlated with levels of urinary protein and serum albumin (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anti-PLA2R antibodies in our Japanese iMN cohort was lower than that in the previous studies from other countries and other Japanese institutes. The low prevalence of antibodies may be related with the characteristics of enrolled patients with mild proteinuria and undetectable antibody levels.
METHODS: We developed an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-PLA2R antibodies, and examined sera from 217 patients with iMN, 22 patients with secondary MN (sMN), and 50 healthy individuals. All patients and healthy individuals were Japanese. The relationships between levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies and clinical parameters were analyzed. Serum samples were also tested using a standardized commercial ELISA (Euroimmun, Germany).
RESULTS: In our ELISA, OD values greater than the mean + 3 standard deviation of healthy subjects were considered to be positive for anti-PLA2R antibodies. Of the patients with iMN, 33.6% (73/217) were positive, but all sMN patients were negative. Our ELISA and the Euroimmun ELISA had a high concordance (93.5%). The proportion of patients with nephrotic syndrome was significantly higher in anti-PLA2R antibody-positive patients than in antibody-negative patients (65.8 vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001). Levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies were significantly correlated with levels of urinary protein and serum albumin (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anti-PLA2R antibodies in our Japanese iMN cohort was lower than that in the previous studies from other countries and other Japanese institutes. The low prevalence of antibodies may be related with the characteristics of enrolled patients with mild proteinuria and undetectable antibody levels.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app