Validation of the Fitbit Flex in an Acute Post-Cardiac Surgery Patient Population.

Purpose: This study examined the validity of the Fitbit Flex activity monitor for step count and distance walked among post-cardiac surgery patients. Method: Participants ( n =20) from a major urban cardiac surgery centre were recruited 1-2 days before hospital discharge. The Fitbit Flex step count and distance walked outputs and video recording of each participant performing the 6-minute walk test were collected. Fitbit Flex output was compared with criterion measures of manual step count obtained from the video recording and manual measurement of distance walked. Statistical analysis compared the output and criterion measures using paired sample t -tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, Lin's concordance correlations, and Bland-Altman plots. Sub-analysis compared slower walking (<0.8 m/s; n =11) and faster walking (≥0.8 m/s; n =8) group speeds (1 participant was excluded from analysis). Results: Steps counted and distance walked were significantly different between the Fitbit Flex outputs and criterion measures ( p <0.05). The Fitbit Flex steps counted and distance walked showed moderate association with manual measure steps counted ( r =0.67) and distance walked ( r =0.45). Lin's concordance coefficients revealed a lack of agreement between the Fitbit Flex and the criterion measurement of both steps counted (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]=0.43) and distance walked (CCC=0.36). The percentage of relative error was -18.6 (SD 22.7) for steps counted and 25.4 (SD 45.8) for distance walked. Conclusions: The Fitbit Flex activity monitor was not a valid measure of step count and distance walked in this sample of post-cardiac surgery patients. The lack of agreement between outputs and criterion measures suggests the Fitbit Flex alone would not be an acceptable clinical outcome measure for monitoring walking progression in the early postoperative period.