Assessing pharmacy technician certification: A national survey comparing certified and noncertified pharmacy technicians.

OBJECTIVES: To compare viewpoints of nationally certified and noncertified technicians and explore the perceived value of technician certification in the job performance domains of medication safety, skills and abilities, experience, engagement and satisfaction, and productivity.

METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of pharmacy technicians, from 6 states representing 4 regions of the United States, was conducted. Technician mailing lists were purchased from Boards of Pharmacy, and randomly selected technicians were sent survey invitations. Surveys were completed via Qualtrics and analyzed with the use of SAS.

RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-six technicians (547 certified, 103 noncertified, and 26 previously certified) responded to the survey (9.4% response rate). Certified technicians reported significantly higher confidence rating for desire to take on new responsibilities (P < 0.01; Cohen d 0.45) and plans to remain in the pharmacy field (P = 0.01, Cohen d 0.35), lower rating for leaving the job in the next 12 months (P < 0.01; Cohen d 0.35), and perceived lower rate of medication errors (P < 0.01; Cohen d 0.35) compared with other technicians in the work setting. The majority of respondents stated confidence in performing the "final check" on another technician's preparation of a new or refill medication if allowed. Both certified and noncertified technicians noted dissatisfaction with pay. The majority of respondents reported that they spent none of or less than 10% of their workday assisting pharmacists with medication therapy management (MTM) sessions, immunizations, or point-of-care tests; however, 71 respondents specifically described how they assist pharmacists with MTM.

CONCLUSION: Results from our survey sample indicate that certified technicians have a stronger organizational and career commitment and desire to take on new roles. A majority of respondents noted dissatisfaction with pay but feel a sense of pride in their work. Both groups were confident in their abilities needed for tech-check-tech product verification.