Managing yield and resilience in a harvested tritrophic food chain model.

In this article, we compare the two ecological services known as yield and resilience, for a tritrophic food chain model consisting of a prey, an intermediate predator and a top predator. For this comparison process, we use both analytical and numerical techniques. It is shown that a variety of patterns are possible based on the intensity of efforts distributed among different trophic levels. Thus we may suggest that fishing down the food chain, as suggested by Pauly et al. (1998) is not bound to happen. Our analysis also shows that balancing the harvest between prey, intermediate predator and top predator could give more yield and stabilizing the ecosystem, than the selective harvesting of any one species. This balanced harvesting may not be a win-win situation for yield and resilience, but it could be a most favourable strategy to balance them. This research would help to correlate resilience with yield and determines the desirable selection of two policies, resilience maximizing yield or maximum sustainable yield to safeguard ecological communities.