We have located links that may give you full text access.
Involvement of the Internal Auditory Canal in Subjects With Cochlear Otosclerosis: A Less Acknowledged Third Window That Affects Surgical Outcome.
Otology & Neurotology 2019 March
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of cavitating lesions involving the internal auditory canal (IAC) in subjects with cochlear otosclerosis with regard to poststapedotomy hearing outcome.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: A retrospective chart review of 134 subjects with otosclerosis treated from January 2011 to June 2017 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital was conducted. Sixteen subjects (23 ears) with temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT)-confirmed cochlear otosclerosis who underwent stapedotomy were included in the study.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure tone audiometry (PTA) (i.e., air and bone conduction; AC and BC, respectively) thresholds and air-bone gap (ABG), measured at 6 months postoperatively were compared between cochlear otosclerosis with and without IAC involvement (IAC group and non-IAC group, respectively).
RESULTS: A total of 14 of 23 ears showed involvement of the IAC. There were no significant differences in age, side of otosclerosis, or preoperative hearing threshold between the two groups. The mean postoperative AC and BC thresholds and ABG of the IAC group were significantly poorer (45.7 dB, 33.8 dB, and 11.8 dB, respectively) than those of the nonIAC group (24.1 dB, 20.0 dB, and 4.1 dB, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear otosclerosis with cavitating lesions involving the IAC showed significantly poorer postoperative audiological outcomes than those without any cavitating lesion. Cavitation extending to the IAC may act as a third window providing a route for sound energy shunting, and thus precluding successful hearing outcome in some subjects with cavitating otosclerosis after stapedotomy.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: A retrospective chart review of 134 subjects with otosclerosis treated from January 2011 to June 2017 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital was conducted. Sixteen subjects (23 ears) with temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT)-confirmed cochlear otosclerosis who underwent stapedotomy were included in the study.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure tone audiometry (PTA) (i.e., air and bone conduction; AC and BC, respectively) thresholds and air-bone gap (ABG), measured at 6 months postoperatively were compared between cochlear otosclerosis with and without IAC involvement (IAC group and non-IAC group, respectively).
RESULTS: A total of 14 of 23 ears showed involvement of the IAC. There were no significant differences in age, side of otosclerosis, or preoperative hearing threshold between the two groups. The mean postoperative AC and BC thresholds and ABG of the IAC group were significantly poorer (45.7 dB, 33.8 dB, and 11.8 dB, respectively) than those of the nonIAC group (24.1 dB, 20.0 dB, and 4.1 dB, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear otosclerosis with cavitating lesions involving the IAC showed significantly poorer postoperative audiological outcomes than those without any cavitating lesion. Cavitation extending to the IAC may act as a third window providing a route for sound energy shunting, and thus precluding successful hearing outcome in some subjects with cavitating otosclerosis after stapedotomy.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2024 March 3
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app