We have located links that may give you full text access.
Diagnostic value of anti-citrullinated fibrinogen antibody in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2019 Februrary 7
AIM: To evaluate the overall diagnostic value of anti-citrullinated fibrinogen (ACF) antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Published studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc, and Chinese VIP databases. QUADAS-2 tool was applied to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Egger's test was used to evaluate for the presence of publication bias.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ACF were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.57-0.64), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94), 9.33 (95% CI: 5.15-16.92), 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30-0.53) and 24.58 (95% CI: 11.47-52.64), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.8018. The results of subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the factors we analyzed might not be the leading causes of heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found.
CONCLUSION: The ACF antibody had a moderate diagnostic accuracy on RA.
METHODS: Published studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc, and Chinese VIP databases. QUADAS-2 tool was applied to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Egger's test was used to evaluate for the presence of publication bias.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ACF were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.57-0.64), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94), 9.33 (95% CI: 5.15-16.92), 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30-0.53) and 24.58 (95% CI: 11.47-52.64), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.8018. The results of subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the factors we analyzed might not be the leading causes of heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found.
CONCLUSION: The ACF antibody had a moderate diagnostic accuracy on RA.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app