We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantified dual energy computed tomography perfusion imaging using myocardial iodine concentration: Validation using CT derived myocardial blood flow and invasive fractional flow reserve in a porcine model.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2019 January 31
BACKGROUND: Myocardial CT perfusion imaging with dual energy (DE-CTP) can produce myocardial iodine perfusion maps. This study evaluated the accuracy of first pass myocardial iodine concentration in DE-CTP compared to CT derived dynamic myocardial blood flow (MBF) to determine regional myocardial ischemia in an animal model of coronary stenosis using invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR).
METHODS: Seven anaesthetised pigs (mean weight 51 ± 4 kg) had a graded coronary artery stenosis produced in six vessels (plus one control animal) using a methacrylate plug with FFR recorded in the target artery (ischemia = FFR<0.80). During adenosine vasodilation, dynamic myocardial CTP and DE-CTP imaging was performed. Using vendor supplied applications, matching regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in myocardial segments supplied by the target coronary artery to compare the two techniques.
RESULTS: FFR correlated strongly to MBF (r = 0.81) and modestly to myocardial iodine concentration (r = 0.65) and myocardial CT attenuation (r = 0.62) (p < 0.0001 each). The correlation to FFR was stronger using relative ratios (absolute value/reference value of normal segments) than absolute values for MBF (r = 0.86), myocardial iodine concentration (r = 0.80) and CT number (r = 0.79) (p < 0.0001 each). Comparing normal and ischaemic territories there were significant differences in MBF (96 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 18 ml/100 ml of tissue/min, p < 0.0001), myocardial iodine concentration (3.5 ± 1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.7 mg/ml, p < 0.0001) and myocardial CT number (89 ± 9 vs. 73 ± 14 HU, p = 0.002). Myocardial iodine concentration had 91% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting FFR <0.8.
CONCLUSION: Quantified myocardial iodine content from first pass DE-CTP correlates with CT derived myocardial blood flow and FFR and accurately discriminates ischemic territories in a porcine model. The accuracy and utility of myocardial iodine content in DE-CTP warrants further investigation in a clinical population with FFR as a reference standard.
METHODS: Seven anaesthetised pigs (mean weight 51 ± 4 kg) had a graded coronary artery stenosis produced in six vessels (plus one control animal) using a methacrylate plug with FFR recorded in the target artery (ischemia = FFR<0.80). During adenosine vasodilation, dynamic myocardial CTP and DE-CTP imaging was performed. Using vendor supplied applications, matching regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in myocardial segments supplied by the target coronary artery to compare the two techniques.
RESULTS: FFR correlated strongly to MBF (r = 0.81) and modestly to myocardial iodine concentration (r = 0.65) and myocardial CT attenuation (r = 0.62) (p < 0.0001 each). The correlation to FFR was stronger using relative ratios (absolute value/reference value of normal segments) than absolute values for MBF (r = 0.86), myocardial iodine concentration (r = 0.80) and CT number (r = 0.79) (p < 0.0001 each). Comparing normal and ischaemic territories there were significant differences in MBF (96 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 18 ml/100 ml of tissue/min, p < 0.0001), myocardial iodine concentration (3.5 ± 1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.7 mg/ml, p < 0.0001) and myocardial CT number (89 ± 9 vs. 73 ± 14 HU, p = 0.002). Myocardial iodine concentration had 91% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting FFR <0.8.
CONCLUSION: Quantified myocardial iodine content from first pass DE-CTP correlates with CT derived myocardial blood flow and FFR and accurately discriminates ischemic territories in a porcine model. The accuracy and utility of myocardial iodine content in DE-CTP warrants further investigation in a clinical population with FFR as a reference standard.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app