We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of insonation angle on peak systolic velocity variation.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019 January 30
OBJECTIVES: As point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become more integrated into emergency and critical care medicine, there has been increased interest in utilizing ultrasound to assess volume status. However, recent studies of carotid POCUS on volume status and fluid responsiveness fail to recognize the effect insonation angle has on their results. To address this, we studied the effect of insonation angle on peak systolic velocity (PSV) change associated with respiratory variation (RV) and passive leg raise (PLR).
METHODS: Doppler measurements were obtained from 51 subjects presenting to the ED. Minimal and maximal PSV were obtained using insonation angles of 46°, 60°, and 90°. ∆PSV was calculated using PLR and RV as trial methods. Results were categorized into two groups, those with a ∆PSV > 10% and those with a ∆PSV ≤ 10%. ∆PSV mean and standard error, as well as measures of agreement were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean ∆PSV associated with PLR test was 9% in the 46° and 60° groups, and 18% in the 90° group, with standard errors of 6, 7, and 14%, respectively. Using 46° as our relative gold standard, Kappa was 0.23 at 60° and 0.11 at 90° with RV as the trial method, and 0.23 at 60° and 0.01 at 90° with a PLR as the trial method.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in PSV is heavily dependent on insonation angle. There was only slight to fair agreement in ∆PSV among the various insonation angles. Further investigation of the optimal insonation angle to assess ∆PSV should be undertaken.
METHODS: Doppler measurements were obtained from 51 subjects presenting to the ED. Minimal and maximal PSV were obtained using insonation angles of 46°, 60°, and 90°. ∆PSV was calculated using PLR and RV as trial methods. Results were categorized into two groups, those with a ∆PSV > 10% and those with a ∆PSV ≤ 10%. ∆PSV mean and standard error, as well as measures of agreement were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean ∆PSV associated with PLR test was 9% in the 46° and 60° groups, and 18% in the 90° group, with standard errors of 6, 7, and 14%, respectively. Using 46° as our relative gold standard, Kappa was 0.23 at 60° and 0.11 at 90° with RV as the trial method, and 0.23 at 60° and 0.01 at 90° with a PLR as the trial method.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in PSV is heavily dependent on insonation angle. There was only slight to fair agreement in ∆PSV among the various insonation angles. Further investigation of the optimal insonation angle to assess ∆PSV should be undertaken.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app