We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Manual vs pressure-controlled facemask ventilation during the induction of general anesthesia in children: A prospective randomized controlled study.
Paediatric Anaesthesia 2019 April
BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation frequently occurs during facemask ventilation in children. In the present study, we compared the incidence of gastric insufflation between pressure-controlled facemask ventilation and manual facemask ventilation during general anesthesia induction in children.
METHODS: Children in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (n = 76) received pressure-controlled facemask ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. In the manual ventilation group (n = 75), facemask ventilation was manually performed by anesthesiologists, who tried to maintain an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. The adjustable pressure limiting valve was set at 13 cm H2 O. The incidence of gastric insufflation during 90 seconds after the initiation of ventilation was assessed using epigastric auscultation and gastric ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The incidence of gastric insufflation was significantly higher in the manual facemask ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (48% vs 12%, respectively; odds ratio 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-17.9; P < 0.001). The mean peak airway pressure during ventilation was significantly higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (16.1 [3.0] cm H2 O vs 13.0 [0.1] cm H2 O; 95% CI of differences, 2.36-3.71 cm H2 O; P < 0.001). The manual ventilation group exhibited a wide peak airway pressure range (11-26 cm H2 O) and a wide variation of tidal volume (0-7.0 mL/kg) compared with those of the pressure-controlled ventilation group (13-14 cm H2 O and 0.6-16.0 mL/kg, respectively).
CONCLUSION: At an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O, pressure-controlled ventilation may be more effective than manual ventilation in preventing gastric insufflation while providing stable ventilation in children.
METHODS: Children in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (n = 76) received pressure-controlled facemask ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. In the manual ventilation group (n = 75), facemask ventilation was manually performed by anesthesiologists, who tried to maintain an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O. The adjustable pressure limiting valve was set at 13 cm H2 O. The incidence of gastric insufflation during 90 seconds after the initiation of ventilation was assessed using epigastric auscultation and gastric ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The incidence of gastric insufflation was significantly higher in the manual facemask ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (48% vs 12%, respectively; odds ratio 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-17.9; P < 0.001). The mean peak airway pressure during ventilation was significantly higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (16.1 [3.0] cm H2 O vs 13.0 [0.1] cm H2 O; 95% CI of differences, 2.36-3.71 cm H2 O; P < 0.001). The manual ventilation group exhibited a wide peak airway pressure range (11-26 cm H2 O) and a wide variation of tidal volume (0-7.0 mL/kg) compared with those of the pressure-controlled ventilation group (13-14 cm H2 O and 0.6-16.0 mL/kg, respectively).
CONCLUSION: At an inspiratory pressure of 13 cm H2 O, pressure-controlled ventilation may be more effective than manual ventilation in preventing gastric insufflation while providing stable ventilation in children.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app