We have located links that may give you full text access.
Usefulness of Implementing Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Outpatients Treated with Pazopanib.
Anticancer Research 2019 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Pazopanib is an effective treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the therapy is often limited by the appearance of adverse events (AEs), including nausea/vomiting, hepatic impairment, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension and oral mucositis. Early management of AEs is, therefore, extremely important in order to maximize treatment outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This non-randomized controlled before-and-after study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of our comprehensive pharmaceutical interventions in 37 outpatients receiving pazopanib for RCC (experimental group). Data were compared with those obtained from 13 patients before the start of pharmaceutical intervention (control group).
RESULTS: The incidence rates of grade 2 or more nausea and anorexia were significantly lower in the experimental, than in the control group (3% versus 38% for nausea, respectively, p=0.003; 8% versus 46% for anorexia, respectively, p=0.005). Importantly, non-adherence based on patient self-assessment was not observed with intervention (0% versus 38%, p<0.001). Consequently, the median total dose of pazopanib was increased by the intervention (72,600 versus 18,200 mg, p=0.002). Moreover, the median time to treatment failure was significantly longer with intervention than before (10.2 versus 1.7 months, HR=0.23, 95% CI=0.110-0.499, p<0.001). These findings suggest that our interventions are highly effective for enhancing treatment outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This non-randomized controlled before-and-after study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of our comprehensive pharmaceutical interventions in 37 outpatients receiving pazopanib for RCC (experimental group). Data were compared with those obtained from 13 patients before the start of pharmaceutical intervention (control group).
RESULTS: The incidence rates of grade 2 or more nausea and anorexia were significantly lower in the experimental, than in the control group (3% versus 38% for nausea, respectively, p=0.003; 8% versus 46% for anorexia, respectively, p=0.005). Importantly, non-adherence based on patient self-assessment was not observed with intervention (0% versus 38%, p<0.001). Consequently, the median total dose of pazopanib was increased by the intervention (72,600 versus 18,200 mg, p=0.002). Moreover, the median time to treatment failure was significantly longer with intervention than before (10.2 versus 1.7 months, HR=0.23, 95% CI=0.110-0.499, p<0.001). These findings suggest that our interventions are highly effective for enhancing treatment outcomes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app